Day 4 of Trump New York hush money trial | CNN Politics

Day 4 of Trump New York hush money trial

The Lead Jeremy Saland Stacy Schneider Trump Trial Jury Alternates Tapper_00001530.png
What we know about the Trump trial jury
06:37 - Source: CNN

What we covered here

  • Opening statements are expected to begin Monday in Donald Trump’s New York hush money criminal trial. A full 12-person jury and six alternate jurors were selected this week over the course of four days. Read about the panel here.
  • In a hearing this afternoon, Trump’s attorneys argued against allowing prosecutors to question the former president about his past legal issues if he testifies, including the $355 million civil fraud judgment and E. Jean Carroll defamation case. The judge said the lawyers will have his decision on the matter by Monday.
  • Trump told reporters that he would testify during the trial.
  • Outside the courthouse, a man lit himself on fire Friday afternoon, law enforcement said. A motive is not clear. Police said there are no public safety threats following the incident, and officials are reviewing security protocols around the court.
108 Posts

We’ve wrapped up our live updates. Learn more about Friday’s proceedings by scrolling through the posts below, and return on Monday for more live coverage of Trump’s hush money criminal trial.

Man who lit himself on fire outside of the courthouse has died, law enforcement official says

Police and emergency officials gather in a park near the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse in New York, where a man lit himself on fire, on April 19.

The man who lit himself on fire outside of the Manhattan courthouse where Donald Trump’s trial was taking place died Friday night, a senior law enforcement official told CNN.

NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said earlier that the man walked into the center of Collect Pond Park, which is directly across from the courthouse.

He opened his backpack and took out pamphlets that he scattered in the park before setting himself on fire.

The man was taken to Cornell Burn Center earlier in critical condition. Police had said they thought it was not likely that he would survive.

Key takeaways from the final day of jury selection in Trump's hush money trial

The historic first criminal trial of a former US president begins with opening statements on Monday.

Judge Juan Merchan swiftly moved through consideration of roughly 200 potential jurors to find a jury pool of 18 by midday Friday, swearing in 12 jurors and six alternates who will decide Donald Trump’s fate in the New York hush money case.

Here are takeaways from the final day of jury selection:

  • The jury is set: Four women and one man were added to the jury on Friday as five of the six alternates for the case. They will sit in the jury box and will hear the duration of the trial, but they will only be put on the jury should one or more of the 12 jurors be excused from the case. Prosecutors focused their questions in the case on preparing the jurors to accept testimony from less-than-favorable witnesses, like Michael Cohen. Trump’s attorneys, meanwhile, were almost singularly focused on a single question: What did jurors think about Donald Trump?
  • Final round of juror questions highlights emotional decision for potential jurors: There were several emotional moments during Friday morning’s questioning of potential jurors, with two jurors telling the judge in the middle of voir dire that they no longer felt they could serve. One female prospective juror who works in sales for a trading company began crying when she was handed the microphone. At one point after that jury had left, another juror raised her hand and told the court she started feeling “high anxiety” as she sat and listened to a line of questioning about the credibility of witnesses.
  • Trump is still trying to stop his trial: Despite seating a jury, Trump’s legal team again tried to stop the trial in its tracks with another strategic appeal. In a new motion filed Friday morning, Trump’s lawyers once again asked an appeals court to temporarily halt the trial until they ruled on Trump’s appeal to move the venue of the hush money trial out of Manhattan. The motion was denied.
  • A hearing on Trump’s gag order violations is set for Tuesday: Despite Trump’s attempts to delay, opening statements in his criminal trial will begin Monday morning. On Tuesday, the morning will shift to Trump’s discussion of witnesses in the case, as Merchan plans to hold a hearing on social media posts by the former president that prosecutors say violated his gag order. They’re asking the judge to fine Trump $1,000 per post and remind him that violations of the gag order could result in imprisonment.

5 alternate jurors were selected Friday. Here's what we know about them

The full panel in Donald Trump’s hush money trial has been set after five alternate jurors were selected Friday.

Remember: A full 12-person jury was seated earlier this week, along with one alternate juror.

Here’s what we know about the alternate jurors selected Friday:

Alternate Juror #1

  • A woman originally from Spain
  • Not currently working
  • Married with adult children
  • Likes to travel
  • Says she does not follow the news and does not have any social media accounts
  • Says she doesn’t “have strong opinions about former President Donald Trump that would interfere” with her ability to be a fair and impartial juror

Alternate Juror #3

  • A native New Yorker
  • He is a fan of martial arts

Alternate Juror #4

  • A contract specialist who has previously lived in New Jersey and Oregon
  • She is married with two children
  • Says she likes to see live music and take her boys to basketball games
  • Says she’s “not a big news person” but looks at The New York Times, Reuters and the BBC
  • Does have social media profiles but doesn’t post or use them

Alternate Juror #5

  • Works for a clothing company
  • Married
  • Says she gets her news from Google

Alternate Juror #6

  • Project manager for a construction company
  • She is divorced with three sons
  • Her boyfriend is in law enforcement
  • Says she listens to true crime podcasts
  • Her father was convicted of a federal crime when she was in high school but she said she was shielded from the details

The full jury is sworn in. Catch up on what happened ahead of opening statements in the hush money trial

The full jury panel has now been seated in the hush money trial against Donald Trump, clearing the way for opening statements to start on Monday.

There are 12 jurors and six alternates who will hear the case against the former president.

Opening statements are set to begin Monday at 9:30 a.m. ET. Court will be a half day on Monday and Tuesday due to Passover, ending at 2 p.m. ET each day.

Leaving the courthouse Friday, Trump again called the trial a “giant witch hunt.” Just hours after jury selection finished, an appeals court denied Trump’s latest attempt to stop the trial from going forward.

Here’s what happened today:

Finishing jury selection:

  • The remaining five alternates were sworn in on Friday. All 12 jurors and one alternate were selected Thursday.
  • The day started with a group of 22 potential jurors answering a questionnaire and facing more questions from lawyers on both sides.
  • Trump watched the alternates’ answers very closely as they shared their opinions of him, turning toward the jury box as they responded. 
  • Before the lunch break, Judge Juan Merchan gave the jurors instructions not to discuss the case with others or research it. He said the court cannot start until all 18 jurors are present each day.

Sandoval hearing:

  • The judge held a Sandoval hearing in the afternoon after the full jury was sworn in. The routine procedure aimed to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask about it if the defendant testifies.
  • Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.
  • The judge said lawyers will have his decision on that matter by Monday.
  • It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify. But coming out of the courtroom, Trump said “yes” when asked whether he would take the stand.

Meantime: A New York appeals court judge denied Trump’s motion for an interim stay pending a change of venue appeal. This was the latest attempt by the former president to stop the hush money trial before opening statements.

Outside the courtroom:

  • A man lit himself on fire outside the courthouse, New York Police Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said.
  • The man walked into the park across the street from the courthouse, throwing flyers into the air, according to Maddrey. He then pulled a canister of what police believe to be an accelerant and lit himself on fire, he said.
  • The man is in critical condition at Cornell Burn Unit.
  • NYPD Chief of Detectives Joe Kenny said police have not determined if the incident was related to Trump’s trial. He said the man did post about the incident on social media and that his internet presence will be part of the ongoing investigation.

See courtroom sketches from Trump's first criminal trial

No cameras are allowed inside the Manhattan courtroom where Donald Trump’s hush money is underway, but sketch artists are capturing the scenes.

Former President Donald Trump, right, speaks with his attorney Todd Blanche in court on April 19 in New York. Trump's attorney Emil Bove is seen in the distance.
In this courtroom sketch, Judge Juan Merchan presides as prosecutor Susan Hoffinger stands at the podium while former President Donald Trump sits during jury selection of his criminal trial.
In this courtroom sketch, former President Donald Trump sits as final jurors are sworn in during his criminal trial.
In this courtroom sketch, former President Donald Trump listens as his attorney Emil Bove argues during the Sandoval hearing.
In this courtroom sketch, Juan Merchan listens as Emil Bove, former President Donald Trump's attorney, argues during the Sandoval hearing.

Trump’s request for interim stay of criminal trial is denied

A New York appeals court judge denied Donald Trump’s motion for an interim stay pending a change of venue appeal of his criminal trial.

This was the latest attempt by the former president to stop the hush money trial right before opening statements, which are set to be heard on Monday.

Judge Marsha Michael gave five minutes for each side to argue their case at the hastily arranged hearing Friday afternoon.

Trump says judge in New York hush money case “wants this to go as fast as possible”

Former President Donald Trump at Manhattan criminal court in New York on Friday.

Former President Donald Trump spoke to reporters as he exited the courtroom Friday, and said Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the hush money trial, “wants this to go as fast as possible.”

The former president also called the trial “a giant witch hunt” and railed against people involved in the separate New York civil fraud case — including Judge Arthur Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James — to make the case that Democrats are targeting him.

Court has adjourned

The court has adjourned for the day. Opening statements in the hush money trial are expected to begin Monday.

Trump says he'll testify

Donald Trump, asked whether he will testify in his hush money criminal trial, said “yes.”

The former president was answering questions from reporters on his way out of the courtroom.

Prosecutors offer to provide name of first witness to Trump attorneys, but warn it should not be tweeted out

Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles renewed the defense’s request for prosecutors to turn over the name of the witness they plan to call on Monday.

She suggested that the prosecution share the name with Trump’s attorneys on condition that they don’t tell their client.

Prosecutors offered to provide the name of the first witness on Sunday

“And should that be tweeted it will be the last time,” Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said, referring to the notion that the former president tweet about the witness if they shared the name of the defense.

Lawyers argued about how much of Trump's criminal history can be brought up if he testifies. Here's a recap

Former President Donald Trump, flanked by attorneys Todd Blanche, left, and and Emil Bove, right, arrives for his criminal trial as jury selection continues at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 19, in New York City. 

Lawyers spent most of Friday afternoon working to outline some ground rules if former President Donald Trump testifies in his hush money trial in New York.

The Sandoval hearing was held after the remaining alternate jurors were selected and sworn in Friday morning. The goal of the hearing was to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify.

Here’s a recap of what happened:

  • Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.
  • Trump attorney Emil Bove accused prosecutors of “piling things on” and trying to confuse the jury about what’s actually at issue in the hush money criminal trial.
  • Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said Trump’s credibility is at the “core” of the trial. He said that’s an argument for allowing additional evidence, not excluding it.
  • At one point, Judge Juan Merchan questioned why it wouldn’t be relevant for prosecutors to try to impeach Trump’s credibility. Bove responded that there’s a cascading effect of having multiple civil lawsuits that are still under appeal.
  • The judge said he will reserve his decision for now, but the lawyers will have it by Monday.

Judge says Trump team appears to be re-arguing ruling on "Access Hollywood" tape

Judge Juan Merchan says that former President Donald Trump’s lawyers appear to be re-arguing his ruling on what can and can’t come in related to the infamous “Access Hollywood tape.”

Merchan said on Monday that he would not allow the tape to be played to jurors but would allow prosecutors to refer to what was said on the tape.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche is arguing that an email being introduced with the text of what was said went beyond what Merchan’s initial decision allowed for, which is why they asked for clarification. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass says that this was already argued on Monday morning.

Merchan says he’s going to go back and read the transcript Monday and see if anything he said is inconsistent with his prior rulings. He said his main concern with the tape was that the jury would “hear your client’s voice,” see his face and his mannerisms.

“My concern is that would be extremely prejudicial,” he says.

"That has to end": Judge says defense cannot keep filing pre-motion letters

Judge Juan Merchan says that the defense cannot continue to keep filing pre-motion letters and motions to try to re-litigate decisions the judge has already made.

“I’ve entertained your motions, I’ve entertained your arguments in good faith. At some point, you need to accept my motions,” he says.

Donald Trump was glaring at Merchan as he was speaking to his attorneys.

The Sandoval hearing is over

The Sandoval hearing has concluded.

Judge Juan Merchan says he will reserve his decision for now, but the lawyers will have it by Monday.

Merchan went on to discuss several exhibits Trump’s lawyers are arguing should be precluded because of presidential immunity.

Attorneys are now raising other issues related to pre-motion letters. Prosecutors are arguing that the judge should reserve any judgment on evidentiary objections until trial.

Remember: A Sandoval hearing is a routine process that will determine what elements of Trump’s past legal issues can be brought up as part of the current hush money criminal trial.

At appeals court, Trump argues for change of venue and interim stay

At a hastily scheduled New York appeals court hearing Friday afternoon, Donald Trump’s attorney Cliff Robert called for an interim stay in the hush money trial and argued the venue should be changed from Manhattan. 

Robert argued that seating a jury in three days with so many potential jurors being dismissed for cause over bias is “untenable.”

He also cited a woman who was seated on the jury Tuesday and asked to be dismissed Thursday after she felt pressure from the media attention. Robert argued it showed how the publicity surrounding the case has made the trial unfair to Trump.

Steven Wu, the district attorney’s appeals lawyer, said the record shows the opposite: that “Jury selection has worked.”

He said there’s been a “robust process” to ensure jurors can be fair and impartial. He also pointed to the juror questionnaire that Wu said is longer than typically used.

Judge Marsha Michael said she would issue a ruling shortly.

Trump attorney accuses prosecutors of "piling things on" to confuse the jury

One of former President Donald Trump’s attorneys, Emil Bove, accused prosecutors of “piling things on” and trying to confuse the jury about what’s actually at issue in the hush money criminal trial.

The comment came during a back-and-forth over which elements of Trump’s past legal issues can be brought up in the current proceedings — part of a routine process called a Sandoval hearing.

Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.

Trump lawyer argues former president shouldn't be questioned about other legal issues as prosecutors push back

Donald Trump’s attorneys are arguing in court right now against bringing in his past legal cases and battles during the hush money criminal trial.

The former president is reacting in court as prosecutors bring up the allegations against him. Here’s a look at the cases:

  • Judgment in $355 million civil fraud order: Trump attorney Emil Bove said the prosecution should not be allowed to use Judge Arthur Engoron’s $355 civil fraud judgment against Trump. Bove also argued that Engoron’s ruling was subject to a preponderance of evidence standard, which is a lower standard than a criminal case. He said the charges in the civil fraud case are similar to the current case, and that the jury “may infer if it happened before Justice Engoron” under a different evidentiary standard, then they could believe “that it also happened beyond a reasonable doubt in this case.”
  • October 2023 gag order: Bove also objected to Engoron’s finding that Trump violated his gag order in October 2023, saying the team is concerned about introducing different standards of proof and confusing the jury. Trump was fined $10,000 after appearing to reference a court clerk in comments made outside the courtroom. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said prosecutors can seek to impeach a witness’ credibility not just through criminal acts but also through “any prior immoral, vicious, illegal, and bad act conduct,” arguing that the violation of the gag order is relevant.
  • E. Jean Carroll defamation case: Bove also argued against allowing prosecutors to question Trump about the Carroll defamation case, arguing that it requires consideration of events “we very much dispute” which date all the way back to the 1990s. Bove argued that to “bring up Ms. Carroll’s allegation at this trial pushes the salaciousness onto another level.” Judge Juan Merchan asked, “Why don’t we not deal with the allegations then,” and just consider the findings in the case. Bove said that still isn’t acceptable. Colangelo argued that the Carroll trials deal with defamation from 2019 and 2022. “That’s not remote,” he said. Trump shook his head as Colangelo spoke about the former president defaming Carroll.

Bove also argued against including a lawsuit Trump filed against Hillary Clinton that was dismissed for being frivolous and in bad faith. Merchan questioned why that wouldn’t be relevant for prosecutors to try to impeach Trump’s credibility. “If that’s not Sandoval, I don’t know what is,” Merchan says after reading some of the opinion criticizing Trump’s frivolous lawsuit. Bove responds that there’s a cascading effect of having multiple civil lawsuits that are still under appeal.

Prosecutor: Witness credibility is at "core" of this trial

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said that as former Donald Trump chooses whether to testify during the trial, it’s clear that witness credibility is at the “core” of it — and that’s an argument for allowing additional evidence, not excluding it.

Trump attorney Emil Bove then moved on to discussing the Trump Organization verdict, arguing that prosecutors in that case — who are sitting to his right — said that those charges were not about Trump. “This case is not about Donald Trump,” Bove quoted prosecutor Susan Hoffinger as saying during that trial.

Judge Juan Merchan also presided over that trial, Colangelo says.

He says that prosecutors in that trial spoke “at length” about what Trump knew, countering the defense argument that a defendant in that case, Allen Weisselberg, had gone “rogue.”

Remember: In December 2022, two Trump Organization companies were found guilty on multiple charges of criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records connected to a 15-year scheme to defraud tax authorities by failing to report and pay taxes on compensation for top executives.

Trump and his family were not charged in this case, but the former president was mentioned repeatedly during the trial by prosecutors about his connection to the benefits doled out to certain executives, including company-funded apartments, car leases and personal expenses.

Judge Merchan says he is not going to allow a trial within a trial

Judge Juan Merchan said he won’t allow a trial within a trial as a Sandoval hearing got underway in the Manhattan courthouse.

A Sandoval hearing is a routine process through which the court will determine to what extent Trump’s past wrongdoing can be brought up in the current trial.

Merchan’s remark came as Trump’s attorneys argued the specifics of a previous $355 million civil fraud judgment against the former president, and whether the prosecution can use it as part of the current proceedings.

Trump was seen hunched forward with his arms on the table as his lawyer debated, with Merchan beside him.