What we covered here
Mark Zuckerberg: He testified today before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In total, the Facebook CEO testified on Capitol Hill about ten hours this week.
Mark Zuckerberg: He testified today before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In total, the Facebook CEO testified on Capitol Hill about ten hours this week.
Our live coverage has ended. Go here, or scroll down to read the highlights from Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony before Congress.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony today on Capitol Hill just ended.
He testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee for nearly five hours. It was his second and final hearing this week in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, bringing the once press shy CEO’s total time testifying on Capitol Hill to about ten hours.
During the testimony, lawmakers pressed Zuckerberg on drugs sales on Facebook, the Cambridge Analytica scandal, censoring conservative voices and self-regulation.
But he faltered somewhat Wednesday when pressed by Rep. Frank Pallone, a Democrat from New Jersey, for a “yes” or “no” answer on whether Facebook would commit to changing its default settings to minimize data collection “to the greatest extent possible.”
“This is a complex issue that deserves more than a one word answer,” Zuckerberg said. Pallone called the response “disappointing.”
Rep. Kathy Castor pressed Zuckerberg hard on whether and how Facebook tracks users after they are off the platform.
Rep. Ben Luján got Zuckerberg to admit that Facebook goes so far as to collect data from some people who have not signed up for the social network “for security purposes.”
Multiple legislators also raised the prospect that Facebook’s data policies with third-party apps violated a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission after a prior privacy complaint. If so, Facebook could be subject to hefty fines. The FTC confirmed last month that it’s investigating Facebook.
We also learned:
— Zuckerberg’s personal data was sold to “malicious third parties.”
— He thinks his industry probably needs to be regulated.
— Zuckerberg says an “enforcement error” is to blame for conservative sisters “Diamond and Silk” being told their Facebook content was “unsafe.”
Other news that happened during the hearing:
— The acting CEO of Cambridge Analytica, the data firm at the center of the Facebook privacy scandal, stepped down.
— Facebook shares dipped slightly during Zuckerberg’s testimony after rising the day before.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told lawmakers today that his company has a counterterrorism team.
The team is comprised of 200 people, who he said are just focused on counterterrorism. Zuckerberg said content reviewers also go over flagged information.
“I think we have capacity in 30 languages that we are working on and in addition to that, we have a number of AI tools that we are developing like the one’s that I mentioned that can proactively go flag the content,” he said in response to a question from Rep. Susan Brooks of Indiana.
She asked Zuckerberg how the team stops terrorist groups from recruiting and communicating.
He said the team first identifies those groups’ patterns of communicating. They then design systems that proactively flag the messaging, so those accounts could be removed.
The company outlined its counterterrorism approach in 2017 in a blog post, where it said that the team included “academic experts on counterterrorism, former prosecutors, former law enforcement agents and analysts, and engineers.”
Congressman Billy Long, a Missouri Republican, asked Mark Zuckerberg about the “Hot-Or-Not”-style website he built while in college that allowed users to rank the attractiveness of females.
“What was FaceMash and is it still up and running?” Long asked Zuckerberg, prompting the CEO to flash a slight smile.
“FaceMash was a prank website that I launched in college, in my dorm room, before I started Facebook,” Zuckerberg said, adding that FaceMash had “nothing to do with Facebook,” despite that it was created around the same time.
Facebook and Instagram have struggled to contain a number of illicit online pharmacies where users buy and trade drugs, West Virginia Republican David McKinley alleged, telling Mark Zuckerberg:
McKinley asked, “When are you going to take down these posts?”
Zuckerberg responded that it was near-impossible to find these posts amongst the billion other pieces of content posted to the platform, but he was focused on building “AI tools” that could help stop them from propagating.
What CNN found
A quick search done by CNN last week turned up plenty of Instagram accounts filled with pictures of various pills.
They typically list contact details – email addresses, phone numbers, and usernames for chat apps and encrypted messenger services like Kik and Wickr – to connect off of Instagram. Put two and two together, and these are likely drug dealers, illicit online pharmacies, or scammers.
Later, Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, quietly took some action to crack down on drug-related posts. A search for #Oxycontin on the app on Friday morning turned up zero posts.
In a statement, an Instagram spokesperson told CNN its community guidelines “make it clear that buying or selling prescription drugs isn’t allowed on Instagram, and we have zero tolerance when it comes to content that puts the safety of our community at risk.”
The acting CEO of Cambridge Analytica, the data firm at the center of the Facebook privacy scandal, has stepped down.
Here’s the statement the company just sent out:
Mirroring an exchange from yesterday’s Senate hearing, Rep. Jan Schakowsky read a list of apologies from Mark Zuckerberg over the years, and told him, “It seems to me from this history… that self-regulation simply does not work.”
Watch:
Facebook shares gave back some of their gains on Wednesday while Zuckerberg was fielding questions from House members.
The stock was down 0.2%, following a 4.5% surge Tuesday — the stock’s best day since 2016.
Shares of other social media companies were mixed. Snap was up nearly 3%. Twitter fell 2.5%. YouTube owner Google was down more than 1%. LinkedIn parent Microsoft was flat.
Mark Zuckerberg was pressed by Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, a Democrat from California, on whether his own personal data was included in the data sold to “malicious third parties.”
His answer?
“Yes.”
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said before that his industry probably needs to be regulated. He repeated that today during questioning from Rep. Fred Upton in the House hearing.
Zuckerberg told CNN last month that he would welcome more regulation of political advertising on the internet.
“There are things like ads transparency regulation that I would love to see,” he told CNN. “If you look at how much regulation there is around advertising on TV and print, it’s just not clear why there should be less on the internet.”
CEO Mark Zuckerberg repeated an apology offered in a prior hearing that Facebook made a “big mistake” by not taking “a broad enough view” of its responsibility.
But he faltered somewhat when pressed by Rep. Frank Pallone, a Democrat from New Jersey, for a “yes” or “no” answer on whether Facebook would commit to changing its default settings to minimize data collection “to the greatest extent possible.”
“This is a complex issue that deserves more than a one-word answer,” Zuckerberg said. Pallone called the response “disappointing.”
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg blamed an “enforcement error” for conservative sisters Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson – better known as Diamond and Silk on Twitter and Facebook – being told their Facebook content was “unsafe,” which they and their supporters decried as censorship.
“We have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it,” Zuckerberg claimed, though as recently as yesterday the sisters claimed Facebook had not.
What happened: The Washington Post reported that the sisters began noticing Facebook was limiting the reach of their posts back in September, and when they sought an explanation, they heard nothing. This month they got an email from Facebook that read, “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community. This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.”
Watch them explain:
A bystander told CNN’s Laurie Segall they “felt a chill” when he walked by.
Mark Zuckerberg has arrived at his House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, where members of Congress are now reading through their opening remarks.
When it’s Zuckerberg’s turn to talk, here’s what he is expected to say.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified yesterday before the Senate Judiciary and Commerce committees about the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Here’s what we learned from his testimony:
— Zuckerberg’s greatest regret is that Facebook was “slow in identifying the Russian operations in 2016,” he said.
— He confirmed that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team spoke with his employees about Russian meddling in the 2016 election. CNN reported last year that Facebook handed Russia-linked ads over to Mueller under search warrant.
— Zuckerberg made several commitments to lawmakers, including ensuring activist groups aren’t targeted on Facebook and promised that his company wouldn’t make “any decisions based on the political ideology of the content.”
— He slapped down an audio mining conspiracy theory. Zuckerberg said Facebook is not listening in on your phone calls.
— Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy thinks Facebook’s “user agreement sucks.”
— Zuckerberg was not sworn-in under oath, but he still had a “legal obligation to testify truthfully,” a Commerce committee GOP aide told CNN.
— A bogus Facebook profile of Delaware Sen. Chris Coons was created and taken down.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will return to Capitol Hill this morning, where he’ll testify before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Zuckerberg testified yesterday for five hours before the Senate Judiciary and Commerce committees, where he formally apologized for mistakes that led to the Cambridge Analytica scandal and stressed that his company is rethinking its responsibility to users and society.
It was the first time that Zuckerberg testified before Congress.
Lawmakers quizzed Zuckerberg on Facebook’s data collection practices, the company’s alleged monopoly power and his views on regulating internet companies.
Zuckerberg did stumble in answering a couple questions, including how Facebook staff came to the decision not to notify users of the Cambridge Analytica data issue when it first came to light in 2015.
On the whole, however, investors appeared to like his performance. Facebook stock ended the day up 4.5%.
During the five-hour hearing, CEO Mark Zuckerberg fielded questions on Facebook’s data collection practices, the company’s alleged monopoly power and his views on regulating internet companies.
But with 44 senators asking questions, an unusually high number, and just five minutes of time allotted for each, there was limited potential for followup questions to and grilling of the CEO.
Perhaps the most memorable line of the afternoon came from Sen. John Kennedy, who slammed Facebook for its complicated terms of service agreement.
“Your user agreement sucks,” said Kennedy, a Republican representing Louisiana. “It’s not to inform your users about their rights. I’m going to suggest to you that you go back home and rewrite it.”