November 6 Trump impeachment inquiry news | CNN Politics

The latest on the Trump impeachment inquiry

trump schiff split
Adam Schiff: Public impeachment hearings to begin
02:19 - Source: CNN

Where things stand now

60 Posts

Our live coverage of the impeachment inquiry has ended for the evening. Read below for the latest news.

Large numbers of people leaving Trump's rally in Louisiana

Large numbers of people are leaving President Trump’s “Keep America Great” rally early tonight, more so than usual as the President continues talking at 8:43 p.m. CST. 

Trump started about an hour late and many of the people leaving early are children and parents. 

The arena was packed to capacity as Trump began the rally, with more outside that couldn’t get in. 

Trump wrongly takes credit for giving a Louisiana facility its permits

As he has done on other occasions, President Trump took credit for the approval of Louisiana’s $10 billion Cameron LNG (liquefied natural gas) facility, which he visited in May.

As the facility’s website explains, it received its permits under the Obama administration.

Trump argues that he is indeed elite

One of President Trump’s more curious rally riffs that he used tonight in Louisiana is his regular complaint about how he is supposedly excluded from “the elite” class.

Rather than arguing that it’s better to be a non-elite than an elite, as another conservative populist might, Trump argues that he is indeed elite by all the traditional measures.

He went on to tell his supporters that they too are elite, in part because of how much money they are making.

Trump repeats an attack on Rep. Adam Schiff over the Ukraine call transcript

At a rally tonight in Louisiana, President Trump claimed that Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, only offered a controversial, confusing paraphrase of the President’s phone call with Ukraine’s president because “he never thought that I was going to release the conversation.”

In fact, Schiff spoke the day after Trump released the rough transcript.

Trump has repeatedly inverted the timeline to make an inaccurate argument that he outsmarted Schiff.

Trump rails against the whistleblower once more at Louisiana rally

President Trump baselessly claimed at a rally in Louisiana tonight that the whistleblower “disappeared” as soon as he released the rough transcript of his “perfect” conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The rough transcript corroborated the whistleblower’s primary allegations about the conversation.He also said that he does not believe the whistleblower’s sources exist.

The whistleblower said their information about the call came from “multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call.”

Trump holds a campaign rally in Louisiana tonight

President Trump is holding a campaign rally in Monroe, Louisiana, tonight.

It is Trump’s second trip to the state in four weeks ahead of the its gubernatorial election on Nov. 16. 

The rally comes as House impeachment investigators released another transcript of their interview with top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor today.

What’s in the transcripts: Taylor told House impeachment investigators that Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani was pressing Ukraine “to intervene in US domestic policy or politics” by launching investigations into Trump’s political rivals, according to a transcript of Bill Taylor’s deposition released Wednesday.

Taylor told Congress in closed-door testimony last month he saw the requests as so dangerous that he believed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky should ignore them — even if it meant losing a one-on-one meeting with Trump.

Inquiry uncovers three examples of the Trump-Ukraine quid pro quo

The impeachment inquiry has uncovered at least three examples of the quid pro quo between President Trump’s administration and Ukraine, where US military aid and a White House visit were used as leverage to secure an announcement that Ukraine was investigating Trump’s rivals, according to documents and testimony from key witnesses.

The question of whether there was a quid pro quo is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Trump has been adamant that he did nothing wrong and tweeted at least 15 times since the inquiry began that there was no quid pro quo. Yet many Democrats have said from the start that they saw evidence of Trump attempting to trade US military assistance for political favors from Ukraine.

After a month of interviews with senior Trump administration officials, lawmakers have unearthed at least three examples of the quid pro quo.

Here’s a breakdown:

The Volker text messages: Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, Kurt Volker, told a senior Ukrainian official that the new Ukrainian president could secure a White House invite if he convinced Trump he would launch an investigation into potential Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election. This happened in a text message from Volker to Andrey Yermak, a senior aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a political newcomer who never held elected office before this year. It was sent shortly before an important call on July 25 between Trump and Zelensky.

Volker told Yermak in the text:

The Trump phone call: After Volker sent those texts, Trump got on the phone with Zelensky. During the July 25 conversation, Zelensky brought up US military assistance to Ukraine, which has been at the center of US policy since Russia and its proxies invaded Eastern Ukraine in 2014. Zelensky told Trump he was interested in buying additional anti-tank missiles that Ukraine could have in its arsenal.

CrowdStrike is the California-based cybersecurity firm that helped the Democratic National Committee figure out that Russia was responsible for the hacking. During the call, Trump mentioned the unfounded theory that the DNC’s hacked servers were somehow hidden in Ukraine.

The Sondland pull-aside: As the summer progressed, a Trump-Zelensky meeting at the White House still had not been scheduled, and news reports revealed that there was an inexplicable holdup in US military and security aid for Ukraine — a $400 million package that was already approved by Congress. Trump was supposed to meet Zelensky at an event in Poland, but those plans fell through when Trump stayed home to deal with a hurricane. Zelensky met with Vice President Mike Pence instead. After that meeting, Zelensky’s aide Yermak had a conversation with US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, a wealthy donor to Trump who handled Ukraine issues. After first denying there was ever a quid pro quo offered to Ukraine, Sondland made a significant revision to his testimony this week in which he admitted that there was.

The White House braces for public hearings

President Trump and his allies are bracing for open hearings that will preoccupy Washington and bring to life the vivid picture of presidential behavior that until now has been confined to written statements and private testimony. 

As Democrats move toward the public phase of their inquiry with an eye to boosting support for Trump’s impeachment, White House officials are gripping for another consequence: a President consumed by the developments.

Trump has already found the specter of impeachment hard to ignore, interspersing references to the “scam” he believes Democrats are pursuing into nearly every White House meeting and set of unrelated public remarks. He has browbeat Republicans into remaining unified, though election losses in Virginia and an apparent narrow victory for Democrats in Kentucky’s governor race have provided little evidence of Trump’s political capital.

But with only brief glimpses of the stone-faced witnesses walking into the secure basement hearing room, neither Trump nor the general public has been able to fully assess their recounting of his approach to Ukraine. Now, the President will learn along with the rest of the country what members of his own administration are saying about how he pressed Ukraine to investigate a political rival.

Since the open testimony was first floated by Democrats, the White House has worked with its Republican allies on Capitol Hill to try and formulate a way both to respond to the testimony and to use the public forum to cast the proceedings as illegitimate. 

What to expect: The White House is expected to do what it has for past high profile public hearings: live monitoring of the public hearing, frequent real time updates to staff and frequent dissemination of talking points to surrogates.

Keep reading here.

Vice President Mike Pence's aide will testify if subpoenaed

Vice President Mike Pence’s aide Jennifer Williams will show up for testimony tomorrow if subpoenaed, according to a source familiar with the matter.  

Generally, the House has been sending subpoenas on the morning of testimony. 

Williams was on the July 25 call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky. Williams was concerned about what she heard on the call but there is no indication Williams raised her concerns to her superiors, according to the source.

Podcast: The impeachment inquiry prepares for its public debut

In today’s episode of “The Daily DC: Impeachment Watch” podcast, CNN Political Director David Chalian looks at: 

  • The transcript of top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor’s testimony
  • Whether the loses in Virginia and Kentucky will force the GOP to rethink their political calculus on impeachment
  • The inquiry’s move into the public view
  • Trump’s many explanations of his Ukraine call

Chalian is joined today by CNN reporter Daniel Dale and CNN political analyst Amanda Carpenter.

Listen to the podcast here.

Taylor testified that Volker supported US officially asking Ukraine to investigate Burisma

Former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker

Bill Taylor, the top US diplomat to Ukraine, told members of Congress that he did not mirror former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker’s support for having the US formally request Ukraine investigate Burisma, a natural gas company.

In his opening statement, Taylor said he gave Swartz’s name to Volker. But while answering questions from lawmakers, Taylor said Volker volunteered to reach out to Swartz.

About Burisma: Former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, sat on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company from May 2014 until April 2019.

Trump has claimed, without offering proof, that Joe Biden tried to have Ukraine’s top prosecutor ousted in 2016 to stop investigations of Burisma, to benefit his son.

But the investigations did not produce any prosecutions, and there is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe Biden, nor that Hunter Biden himself was ever under investigation.

Taylor was OK with Giuliani's role at first

Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor said he initially “wasn’t disturbed” by Rudy Giuliani’s role in steering US policy toward Ukraine, but that his opinion soured as he learned more about the political favors Giuliani was seeking from Ukraine. 

“Actually, I wasn’t disturbed by that,” Taylor said of Trump’s order to State Department diplomats that they work with Giuliani on Ukraine policy. “It’s not unusual to ask people outside the government to play a role.” 

Former US special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker was brought in from the outside to help, Taylor noted. Volker kept his civilian job while also working as a volunteer diplomat to handle the Ukraine crisis.  

Taylor continued: “There have been examples, we’ve heard about them recently of other civilians doing work for the State Department. And as long as the people pulled in from the outside, consulted from the outside, giving advice or ideas on policy, that’s – we see that all the time. We all have seen that, and that’s okay, as long as it’s consistent with and supports the main thrust of U.S. foreign policy.”

But Taylor said his views changed over time, and that he grew alarmed by what Giuliani was up to, and even concerns about what was happening with US policy toward Ukraine with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. 

Republicans are likely to seize on Taylor’s initial comments about Giuliani to claim that there was nothing wrong with Trump bringing in his personal attorney to play a role in official US government foreign policy. 

Taylor over time understood "investigations" meant into Bidens and DNC hacks

Diplomat Bill Taylor said that he understood by early July that when President Trump appointees were talking about Ukraine launching “investigations” that they were talking about the desired probes into former Vice President Joe Biden and into conspiracy theories about the Democratic email hacks in 2016.  

A key sticking point in the inquiry is what was meant by “investigations.”

Some of Trump’s defenders have leaned into the vagueness of this term, and Trump has said all he cares about is ending corruption in Ukraine. But testimony from Taylor and other witnesses suggests that it was widely understood that the “investigations” were tantamount to political meddling by Ukraine. 

Taylor testified he didn't feel the same pressure as Yovanovitch

Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor testified that he was never made to feel out of line after his pushback against the Ukraine policy being pursued by Rudy Giuliani and the administration’s “three amigos.”

Citing the pressure placed on his predecessor Marie Yovanovitch by Giuliani and others, Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi asked Taylor if he was aware of “any attempts by Giuliani or anyone else” to “come back at him” after he had texted his concerns to Gordon Sondland and Kurt Volker. Taylor said “no.”

“Did anybody ever question you directly about your statements and whether you were somehow out of line in making the statements that you made?” Krishnamoorthi asked Taylor. 

“Not yet,” Taylor said.

Taylor adds new details on Trump-Ukraine quid pro quo

Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor gave lawmakers new information about how Trump officials pressed Ukraine to launch politically charged investigations that could help the President’s re-election.  

Taylor described a call with US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on June 27 where they discussed the upcoming phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 

Taylor testified that Sondland told him that “President Zelensky, needed to make clear to President Trump that he, President Zelensky, was not standing in the way of investigations.” 

Asked for specifics, Taylor said he didn’t know at the time exactly which investigations Sondland was referring to, but that he knew they were related to the probes that Rudy Giuliani was seeking.

Taylor said Trump held up Ukraine aid for "domestic political gain" to cast Biden in "bad light"

Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor clarified to members of Congress that in his opening statement, when he was referring to the administration holding up Ukraine aid for “domestic political gain” or a “political campaign,” he was specifically referring to President Trump casting former Vice President Joe Biden “in a bad light.” 

In his opening testimony, Taylor said he “told Ambassadors Sondland and Volker … ‘I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.’” 

“I argued to both that the explanation made no sense: the Ukrainians did not ‘owe’ President Trump anything, and holding up security assistance for domestic political gain was ‘crazy,” he continued in his opening remarks. 

Taylor was asked specifically what he was referring to by New York Democratic Rep. Sean Maloney.

“As I understood the reason for investigating Burisma was to cast Vice President Biden in a bad light,” Taylor told members of Congress during the question and answer period. 

The political campaign to gain from the investigation, he said, was “a political campaign for the reelection of President Trump.” 

This Republican senator objected to an unanimous resolution on whistleblower protections today

Days after Republican Sen. Rand Paul called the for the Ukraine whistleblower’s identity to be made public, Senate Democrats attempted to pass an unanimous resolution to recognize the role of Congress and the Executive Branch to protect whistleblowers today. 

Paul objected saying he wanted the Senate to pass his own bill that would apply whistleblower protections to Edward Snowden and allow President Trump to face his accuser. 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said GOP calls to name the whistleblower are “wrong” and “dangerous” and outing them would send a “chilling message to future patriots.” He urged the Senate to pass this resolution to reaffirm a longstanding tradition to protect whistleblowers. These are laws that have existed “since the founding of our republic,” Schumer added.

After Sen. Mazie Hirono, a Democrat of Hawaii, asked for unanimous consent, Paul objected. He then introduced his own bill, The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2019, which he said would provide retroactive protections for whistleblowers that could then be applied to defend Snowden, for example, and would ensure the president can have a right to address his accuser.

Paul said he isn’t objecting because he doesn’t support whistleblowers, but the system should be refined.

Hirono added in response that Paul is undermining whistleblower protections, which makes even just the name of his bill, The Whistleblower Protection Act, “appalling” and “laughable.” 

House has withdrawn its subpoena of Charles Kupperman, according to court filing

In a sign that Democrats don’t want a prolonged battle for witnesses in their impeachment probe, the House of Representatives says it is retracting the subpoena for former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman.

The House instead suggested Kupperman should abide by what is decided in a separate case that is further along, its lawsuit against Don McGahn to force the former White House counsel to testify.

The House told Kupperman’s attorney yesterday it still would be interested in speaking with him in the impeachment inquiry, and that he should sit for a deposition if another federal judge knocks down the White House’s blocking tactic in McGahn’s case. McGahn was subpoenaed in April to discuss the President’s attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation.

McGahn’s case is “much closer to resolution by the court than Dr. Kupperman’s flawed suit,” the House wrote to Kupperman’s attorneys yesterday. “Unless your lawsuit was admittedly only for purposes of delay, and without a subpoena in force, the Committees expect that your client will voluntarily dismiss the complaint … and be guided by the decision in McGahn.”

CLARIFICATION: This post has been updated to clarify that the House of Representatives is retracting its subpoena of Kupperman but still may want to question him.

Taylor squarely blames Ukraine controversy on Giuliani and Trump

Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor said in newly released congressional testimony that he believes the idea of the US pressing Ukraine to investigate Burisma and 2016 came from Rudy Giuliani, who was representing the interests of President Donald Trump. 

Taylor confirmed New Jersey Democrat Tom Malinowski’s description of two Trump administration camps diverging on the Ukraine issue — those who wanted to go along with the President’s call for Ukraine to investigate and those who would not compromise their principles. 

“You (all) wanted a good relationship between the two countries. And then at a certain point, you all learned that the President was in a different place, correct?” Malinowski asked. 

“Yes,” Taylor responded. 

Taylor also agreed with the assessment that the officials were divided into two camps. 

Asked if Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland was responsible for what White House national security adviser John Bolton referred to as the “drug deal” — essentially withholding Ukraine aid in exchange for the requested investigations — Taylor pointed to Giuliani as a proxy for Trump. 

“I don’t think so,” Taylor said, referring to the question of whether Sondland was responsible.

“I think the origin of the idea to get President Zelensky to say out loud he’s going to investigate Burisma and the 2016 election, I think the originator, the person who came up with that was Mr. Giuliani,” he continued.

“And he was representing whose interests in —” Malinowski asked.

“President Trump,” Taylor responded.

READ MORE

Pence aide likely to testify in impeachment inquiry
Key diplomat changes testimony and admits quid pro quo with Ukraine
GOP’s raging hypocrisy on impeachment
Trump’s impeachment defense splintered by new revelations

READ MORE

Pence aide likely to testify in impeachment inquiry
Key diplomat changes testimony and admits quid pro quo with Ukraine
GOP’s raging hypocrisy on impeachment
Trump’s impeachment defense splintered by new revelations