Key testimony: David Hale, a high-ranking State Department official, testified today in the impeachment inquiry. Three other officials were scheduled to testify but are not expected to show up.
Our live coverage of the impeachment inquiry has ended for the evening. Read below for the latest news.
Link Copied!
Large numbers of people leaving Trump's rally in Louisiana
From CNN's Allie Malloy and Jim Acosta
Large numbers of people are leaving President Trump’s “Keep America Great” rally early tonight, more so than usual as the President continues talking at 8:43 p.m. CST.
Trump started about an hour late and many of the people leaving early are children and parents.
The arena was packed to capacity as Trump began the rally, with more outside that couldn’t get in.
Link Copied!
Trump wrongly takes credit for giving a Louisiana facility its permits
From CNN's Daniel Dale
As he has done on other occasions, President Trump took credit for the approval of Louisiana’s $10 billion Cameron LNG (liquefied natural gas) facility, which he visited in May.
As the facility’s website explains, it received its permits under the Obama administration.
Link Copied!
Trump argues that he is indeed elite
From CNN's Daniel Dale
One of President Trump’s more curious rally riffs that he used tonight in Louisiana is his regular complaint about how he is supposedly excluded from “the elite” class.
Rather than arguing that it’s better to be a non-elite than an elite, as another conservative populist might, Trump argues that he is indeed elite by all the traditional measures.
He went on to tell his supporters that they too are elite, in part because of how much money they are making.
Link Copied!
Trump repeats an attack on Rep. Adam Schiff over the Ukraine call transcript
From CNN's Daniel Dale
At a rally tonight in Louisiana, President Trump claimed that Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, only offered a controversial, confusing paraphrase of the President’s phone call with Ukraine’s president because “he never thought that I was going to release the conversation.”
In fact, Schiff spoke the day after Trump released the rough transcript.
Trump has repeatedly inverted the timeline to make an inaccurate argument that he outsmarted Schiff.
Link Copied!
Trump rails against the whistleblower once more at Louisiana rally
From CNN's Daniel Dale
Pool
President Trump baselessly claimed at a rally in Louisiana tonight that the whistleblower “disappeared” as soon as he released the rough transcript of his “perfect” conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The rough transcript corroborated the whistleblower’s primary allegations about the conversation.He also said that he does not believe the whistleblower’s sources exist.
The whistleblower said their information about the call came from “multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call.”
Link Copied!
Trump holds a campaign rally in Louisiana tonight
MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images
President Trump is holding a campaign rally in Monroe, Louisiana, tonight.
It is Trump’s second trip to the state in four weeks ahead of the its gubernatorial election on Nov. 16.
The rally comes as House impeachment investigators released another transcript of their interview with top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor today.
What’s in the transcripts: Taylor told House impeachment investigators that Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani was pressing Ukraine “to intervene in US domestic policy or politics” by launching investigations into Trump’s political rivals, according to a transcript of Bill Taylor’s deposition released Wednesday.
Taylor told Congress in closed-door testimony last month he saw the requests as so dangerous that he believed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky should ignore them — even if it meant losing a one-on-one meeting with Trump.
Link Copied!
Inquiry uncovers three examples of the Trump-Ukraine quid pro quo
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The impeachment inquiry has uncovered at least three examples of the quid pro quo between President Trump’s administration and Ukraine, where US military aid and a White House visit were used as leverage to secure an announcement that Ukraine was investigating Trump’s rivals, according to documents and testimony from key witnesses.
The question of whether there was a quid pro quo is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.
Trump has been adamant that he did nothing wrong and tweeted at least 15 times since the inquiry began that there was no quid pro quo. Yet many Democrats have said from the start that they saw evidence of Trump attempting to trade US military assistance for political favors from Ukraine.
After a month of interviews with senior Trump administration officials, lawmakers have unearthed at least three examples of the quid pro quo.
Here’s a breakdown:
The Volker text messages: Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, Kurt Volker, told a senior Ukrainian official that the new Ukrainian president could secure a White House invite if he convinced Trump he would launch an investigation into potential Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election. This happened in a text message from Volker to Andrey Yermak, a senior aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a political newcomer who never held elected office before this year. It was sent shortly before an important call on July 25 between Trump and Zelensky.
Volker told Yermak in the text:
The Trump phone call: After Volker sent those texts, Trump got on the phone with Zelensky. During the July 25 conversation, Zelensky brought up US military assistance to Ukraine, which has been at the center of US policy since Russia and its proxies invaded Eastern Ukraine in 2014. Zelensky told Trump he was interested in buying additional anti-tank missiles that Ukraine could have in its arsenal.
CrowdStrike is the California-based cybersecurity firm that helped the Democratic National Committee figure out that Russia was responsible for the hacking. During the call, Trump mentioned the unfounded theory that the DNC’s hacked servers were somehow hidden in Ukraine.
The Sondland pull-aside: As the summer progressed, a Trump-Zelensky meeting at the White House still had not been scheduled, and news reports revealed that there was an inexplicable holdup in US military and security aid for Ukraine — a $400 million package that was already approved by Congress. Trump was supposed to meet Zelensky at an event in Poland, but those plans fell through when Trump stayed home to deal with a hurricane. Zelensky met with Vice President Mike Pence instead. After that meeting, Zelensky’s aide Yermak had a conversation with US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, a wealthy donor to Trump who handled Ukraine issues. After first denying there was ever a quid pro quo offered to Ukraine, Sondland made a significant revision to his testimony this week in which he admitted that there was.
Link Copied!
The White House braces for public hearings
From CNN's Kevin Liptak, Kaitlan Collins, Jeremy Diamond and Pamela Brown
Trump has already found the specter of impeachment hard to ignore, interspersing references to the “scam” he believes Democrats are pursuing into nearly every White House meeting and set of unrelated public remarks. He has browbeat Republicans into remaining unified, though election losses in Virginia and an apparent narrow victory for Democrats in Kentucky’s governor race have provided little evidence of Trump’s political capital.
But with only brief glimpses of the stone-faced witnesses walking into the secure basement hearing room, neither Trump nor the general public has been able to fully assess their recounting of his approach to Ukraine. Now, the President will learn along with the rest of the country what members of his own administration are saying about how he pressed Ukraine to investigate a political rival.
Since the open testimony was first floated by Democrats, the White House has worked with its Republican allies on Capitol Hill to try and formulate a way both to respond to the testimony and to use the public forum to cast the proceedings as illegitimate.
What to expect: The White House is expected to do what it has for past high profile public hearings: live monitoring of the public hearing, frequent real time updates to staff and frequent dissemination of talking points to surrogates.
Vice President Mike Pence's aide will testify if subpoenaed
From CNN's Rene Marsh
Vice President Mike Pence’s aide Jennifer Williams will showup for testimony tomorrow if subpoenaed, according to a source familiar with the matter.
Generally, the House has been sending subpoenas on the morning of testimony.
Williams was on the July 25 call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky. Williams was concerned about what she heard on the call but there is no indication Williams raised her concerns to her superiors, according to the source.
Link Copied!
Podcast: The impeachment inquiry prepares for its public debut
In today’s episode of “The Daily DC: Impeachment Watch” podcast, CNN Political Director David Chalian looks at:
The transcript of top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor’s testimony
Whether the loses in Virginia and Kentucky will force the GOP to rethink their political calculus on impeachment
The inquiry’s move into the public view
Trump’s many explanations of his Ukraine call
Chalian is joined today by CNN reporter Daniel Dale and CNN political analyst Amanda Carpenter.
Taylor testified that Volker supported US officially asking Ukraine to investigate Burisma
From CNN's Maegan Vazquez
Former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker
Zach Gibson/Getty Images
Bill Taylor, the top US diplomat to Ukraine, told members of Congress that he did not mirror former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker’s support for having the US formally request Ukraine investigate Burisma, a natural gas company.
In his opening statement, Taylor said he gave Swartz’s name to Volker. But while answering questions from lawmakers, Taylor said Volker volunteered to reach out to Swartz.
About Burisma: Former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, sat on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company from May 2014 until April 2019.
Trump has claimed, without offering proof, that Joe Biden tried to have Ukraine’s top prosecutor ousted in 2016 to stop investigations of Burisma, to benefit his son.
But the investigations did not produce any prosecutions, and there is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe Biden, nor that Hunter Biden himself was ever under investigation.
Link Copied!
Taylor was OK with Giuliani's role at first
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor said he initially “wasn’t disturbed” by Rudy Giuliani’s role in steering US policy toward Ukraine, but that his opinion soured as he learned more about the political favors Giuliani was seeking from Ukraine.
“Actually, I wasn’t disturbed by that,” Taylor said of Trump’s order to State Department diplomats that they work with Giuliani on Ukraine policy. “It’s not unusual to ask people outside the government to play a role.”
Former US special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker was brought in from the outside to help, Taylor noted. Volker kept his civilian job while also working as a volunteer diplomat to handle the Ukraine crisis.
Taylor continued: “There have been examples, we’ve heard about them recently of other civilians doing work for the State Department. And as long as the people pulled in from the outside, consulted from the outside, giving advice or ideas on policy, that’s – we see that all the time. We all have seen that, and that’s okay, as long as it’s consistent with and supports the main thrust of U.S. foreign policy.”
But Taylor said his views changed over time, and that he grew alarmed by what Giuliani was up to, and even concerns about what was happening with US policy toward Ukraine with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
Republicans are likely to seize on Taylor’s initial comments about Giuliani to claim that there was nothing wrong with Trump bringing in his personal attorney to play a role in official US government foreign policy.
Link Copied!
Taylor over time understood "investigations" meant into Bidens and DNC hacks
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP/Getty Images
Diplomat Bill Taylor said that he understood by early July that when President Trump appointees were talking about Ukraine launching “investigations” that they were talking about the desired probes into former Vice President Joe Biden and into conspiracy theories about the Democratic email hacks in 2016.
A key sticking point in the inquiry is what was meant by “investigations.”
Some of Trump’s defenders have leaned into the vagueness of this term, and Trump has said all he cares about is ending corruption in Ukraine. But testimony from Taylor and other witnesses suggests that it was widely understood that the “investigations” were tantamount to political meddling by Ukraine.
Link Copied!
Taylor testified he didn't feel the same pressure as Yovanovitch
From CNN's Mike Warren
Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor testified that he was never made to feel out of line after his pushback against the Ukraine policy being pursued by Rudy Giuliani and the administration’s “three amigos.”
Citing the pressure placed on his predecessor Marie Yovanovitch by Giuliani and others, Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi asked Taylor if he was aware of “any attempts by Giuliani or anyone else” to “come back at him” after he had texted his concerns to Gordon Sondland and Kurt Volker. Taylor said “no.”
“Did anybody ever question you directly about your statements and whether you were somehow out of line in making the statements that you made?” Krishnamoorthi asked Taylor.
“Not yet,” Taylor said.
Link Copied!
Taylor adds new details on Trump-Ukraine quid pro quo
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor gave lawmakers new information about how Trump officials pressed Ukraine to launch politically charged investigations that could help the President’s re-election.
Taylor described a call with US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on June 27 where they discussed the upcoming phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Taylor testified that Sondland told him that “President Zelensky, needed to make clear to President Trump that he, President Zelensky, was not standing in the way of investigations.”
Asked for specifics, Taylor said he didn’t know at the time exactly which investigations Sondland was referring to, but that he knew they were related to the probes that Rudy Giuliani was seeking.
Link Copied!
Taylor said Trump held up Ukraine aid for "domestic political gain" to cast Biden in "bad light"
From CNN's Maegan Vazquez
Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor clarified to members of Congress that in his opening statement, when he was referring to the administration holding up Ukraine aid for “domestic political gain” or a “political campaign,” he was specifically referring to President Trump casting former Vice President Joe Biden “in a bad light.”
In his opening testimony, Taylor said he “told Ambassadors Sondland and Volker … ‘I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.’”
“I argued to both that the explanation made no sense: the Ukrainians did not ‘owe’ President Trump anything, and holding up security assistance for domestic political gain was ‘crazy,” he continued in his opening remarks.
Taylor was asked specifically what he was referring to by New York Democratic Rep. Sean Maloney.
“As I understood the reason for investigating Burisma was to cast Vice President Biden in a bad light,” Taylor told members of Congress during the question and answer period.
The political campaign to gain from the investigation, he said, was “a political campaign for the reelection of President Trump.”
Link Copied!
This Republican senator objected to an unanimous resolution on whistleblower protections today
From CNN's Ali Zaslav and Ted Barrett
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
Days after Republican Sen. Rand Paul called the for the Ukraine whistleblower’s identity to be made public, Senate Democrats attempted to pass an unanimous resolution to recognize the role of Congress and the Executive Branch to protect whistleblowers today.
Paul objected saying he wanted the Senate to pass his own bill that would apply whistleblower protections to Edward Snowden and allow President Trump to face his accuser.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said GOP calls to name the whistleblower are “wrong” and “dangerous” and outing them would send a “chilling message to future patriots.” He urged the Senate to pass this resolution to reaffirm a longstanding tradition to protect whistleblowers. These are laws that have existed “since the founding of our republic,” Schumer added.
After Sen. Mazie Hirono, a Democrat of Hawaii, asked for unanimous consent, Paul objected. He then introduced his own bill, The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2019, which he said would provide retroactive protections for whistleblowers that could then be applied to defend Snowden, for example, and would ensure the president can have a right to address his accuser.
Paul said he isn’t objecting because he doesn’t support whistleblowers, but the system should be refined.
Hirono added in response that Paul is undermining whistleblower protections, which makes even just the name of his bill, The Whistleblower Protection Act, “appalling” and “laughable.”
Link Copied!
House has withdrawn its subpoena of Charles Kupperman, according to court filing
From CNN's Katelyn Polantz
In a sign that Democrats don’t want a prolonged battle for witnesses in their impeachment probe, the House of Representatives says it is retracting the subpoena for former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman.
The House instead suggested Kupperman should abide by what is decided in a separate case that is further along, its lawsuit against Don McGahn to force the former White House counsel to testify.
The House told Kupperman’s attorney yesterday it still would be interested in speaking with him in the impeachment inquiry, and that he should sit for a deposition if another federal judge knocks down the White House’s blocking tactic in McGahn’s case. McGahn was subpoenaed in April to discuss the President’s attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation.
McGahn’s case is “much closer to resolution by the court than Dr. Kupperman’s flawed suit,” the House wrote to Kupperman’s attorneys yesterday. “Unless your lawsuit was admittedly only for purposes of delay, and without a subpoena in force, the Committees expect that your client will voluntarily dismiss the complaint … and be guided by the decision in McGahn.”
CLARIFICATION: This post has been updated to clarify that the House of Representatives is retracting its subpoena of Kupperman but still may want to question him.
Link Copied!
Taylor squarely blames Ukraine controversy on Giuliani and Trump
From CNN's Maegan Vazquez
Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor said in newly released congressional testimony that he believes the idea of the US pressing Ukraine to investigate Burisma and 2016 came from Rudy Giuliani, who was representing the interests of President Donald Trump.
Taylor confirmed New Jersey Democrat Tom Malinowski’s description of two Trump administration camps diverging on the Ukraine issue — those who wanted to go along with the President’s call for Ukraine to investigate and those who would not compromise their principles.
“You (all) wanted a good relationship between the two countries. And then at a certain point, you all learned that the President was in a different place, correct?” Malinowski asked.
“Yes,” Taylor responded.
Taylor also agreed with the assessment that the officials were divided into two camps.
Asked if Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland was responsible for what White House national security adviser John Bolton referred to as the “drug deal” — essentially withholding Ukraine aid in exchange for the requested investigations — Taylor pointed to Giuliani as a proxy for Trump.
“I don’t think so,” Taylor said, referring to the question of whether Sondland was responsible.
“I think the origin of the idea to get President Zelensky to say out loud he’s going to investigate Burisma and the 2016 election, I think the originator, the person who came up with that was Mr. Giuliani,” he continued.
“And he was representing whose interests in —” Malinowski asked.
“President Trump,” Taylor responded.
Link Copied!
David Hale left Capitol Hill after more than six hours of testimony
Hale is the third highest ranking official at the State Department and the highest ranking career State Department official.
Three other officials were scheduled to testify but are not expected to show up.
Link Copied!
Taylor: Giuliani wanted Ukraine to meddle in US election
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Bill Taylor, the top US Diplomat to Ukraine, leaves Capitol Hill on Oct. 22 in Washington, DC.
Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images
Bill Taylor, the top diplomat to Ukraine, said President Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani was pressing Ukraine “to intervene in US domestic policy or politics” by launching investigations into Trump’s political rivals, according to the transcript.
This testimony corroborates a major allegation from the whistleblower complaint, that Giuliani and Trump were trying to solicit help from the Ukrainians to boost his re-election chances in 2020. Giuliani wanted Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and Democratic National Committee servers.
Taylor said he saw the requests as so dangerous that he believed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky should ignore them — even if it meant losing a one-on-one meeting with Trump.
In his testimony, Taylor said it would be unacceptable for a foreign country to meddle in the US election. Other witnesses have also condemned any effort to solicit electoral help from Ukraine.
Link Copied!
Taylor said Trump's Ukraine aid package was better than Obama's
From CNN's Jenny Hansler
Bill Taylor, the top diplomat to Ukraine, told the House committees that he felt that the Trump administration’s aid package to Ukraine was an improvement over that of the Obama administration.
He continued: “There was also a very strong political message that said that the Americans are willing to provide more than blankets. I mean, that was the previous. And these weapons are serious weapons. They will kill Russian tanks. So these were serious weapons. It was a demonstration that we support Ukraine.”
While serving outside of the government, Taylor had urged the Obama administration to provide lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine, but he said, “the objection was that it might provoke the Russians.”
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has repeatedly touted the fact that the Trump administration provided weapons to Ukraine, noting to the New York Post that the “previous administration chose to provide blankets.”
Taylor explained to the House committees that “the prior administration had been willing to give aid, but ‘blankets’ was just kind of the more derogatory version of it, but it was nonlethal weapons.”
“So there was communications equipment, there were vehicles, there were maybe some rations, there were blankets, there were night-vision goggles. So it was a significant package, but it stopped short of weapons,” he said.
Link Copied!
Taylor described his "nightmare scenario" text during his testimony
From CNN's Jenny Hansler
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor sent a text message to former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker and Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on September 9, describing his “nightmare scenario,” as it related to frozen US security aid.
“The message to the Ukrainians (and Russians) we send with the decision on security assistance is key. With the hold, we have already shaken their faith in us. Thus my nightmare scenario,” Taylor wrote on September 9. Russia has made repeated illegal incursions into Ukraine.
“As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign,” he added.
During his testimony to lawmakers, Taylor described exactly what he meant by his texts.
“The Russians loving it. The Russians are paying attention. The Russians are paying attention to how much support the Americans are going to provide the Ukrainians,” Taylor continued. “And they, the Russians want to know how much support the Ukrainians are going to get in general, but also what kind of support from the Americans. So the Russians are loving, would love, the humiliation of Zelensky at the hands of the Americans, and would give the Russians a freer hand, and I would quit.”
Taylor said he was worried about such a scenario when he met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on May 28 and said he told Pompeo that if the US policy on Ukraine changed, he would leave.
Link Copied!
Taylor feared Trump could let Russia keep Crimea
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Career diplomat Bill Taylor told lawmakers that one reason why he was worried about taking the post in Kiev was because he was afraid that the Trump administration might abruptly change US policy toward Ukraine to make it much more friendly to Russia.
Taylor said if that were to happen, “I would have to resign,” according to the transcript.
In the past, Trump has praised how Russian President Vladimir Putin handled the invasion of Crimea, and has parroted Kremlin talking points about the annexed Ukrainian territory. Trump made those controversial comments during the 2016 campaign, saying “the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were.”
The Russian military annexed Crimea in 2014, wresting it from Ukrainian control. It has been part of Ukraine since the 1950s.
Link Copied!
Taylor took meticulous notes and kept a notebook
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Top diplomat Bill Taylor’s opening statement was extraordinarily detailed and included information about various phone conversations and in-person meetings.
He told lawmakers that he is a meticulous note-taker and referred to his records when preparing for his testimony.
Link Copied!
Taylor said it was "improper" to request Ukrainians investigate Burisma
From CNN's Kevin Liptak
The top US diplomat in Ukraine told impeachment committees he believed it was “improper” to ask the Ukrainian government to investigate Burisma, the gas company on whose board Hunter Biden sits.
Questioned by Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, on whether it was also improper because the goal was to influence US elections, Taylor said yes.
Later, he described Ukrainian officials as increasingly aware of the request to launch investigations as a condition for setting up a meeting with President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
“I think it was becoming clear to the Ukrainians that, in order to get this meeting that they wanted, they would have to commit to pursuing these investigations,” he said.
Taylor said he was “embarrassed” in conversations with Ukrainian officials when they asked about stalled US aid since he didn’t know the reasons behind the freeze.
Link Copied!
Taylor said he never talked to Trump
From CNN's Clare Foran
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Top diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor testified that he “never talked to the President” when pressed by a GOP lawmaker on whether he knew firsthand Trump was conditioning investigations on meeting with Ukrainian president
In response to GOP Rep. Lee Zeldin of New York, Taylor stated that he “had no conversations with the President” and later added, “I’ve never talked to the President.”
During Zeldin’s questioning, Taylor also said, “What I know is that the direction was coming from Giuliani.”
Link Copied!
Taylor thought call for Ukraine to investigate was a "bad idea"
From CNN's Jenny Hansler
Top diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor stated unequivocally to the House committees that he thought the call for Ukraine to launch investigations was “a bad idea.”
He said that former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker had “volunteered” to reach out to Deputy Assistant Attorney General Bruce Swartz about the investigations and that was “fine with (him).”
Volker testified that, spurred by questions from Ukrainian officials, he wanted to check if the Justice Department had asked for such investigations.
Link Copied!
Taylor told Pompeo he was worried about Giuliani’s role
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Impeachment investigators asked Bill Taylor, the top diplomat to Ukraine, to read excerpts from a May 2019 article in The New York Times, which revealed Rudy Giuliani’s plans to travel to Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Bidens. Taylor said he found the news troubling and it gave him second thoughts about taking ambassador job in Kiev.
To hash out with those qualms, Taylor said he spoke with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and State Department Counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl, and that he specifically raised concerns about Giuliani.
“I let them know up front going into the meeting that I had not decided whether to accept the offer to go back out to Kyiv because I was troubled by what I was hearing, not just this Giuliani article, but I was troubled by other things as well and I made this clear to both, both Mr. Brechbuhl and Secretary Pompeo,” Taylor said.
In response, Pompeo told Taylor that he would always support a “strong US Policy” toward Ukraine, and that he would “make this case to President Trump,” according to Taylor’s testimony.
Link Copied!
Taylor testified that US officials wanted to resume Ukraine aid
From CNN's Maegan Vazquez
Top US Diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor said in congressional testimony that he “was told a couple of times by people at State and people at the NSC that the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, the National Security Adviser, and the head of the CIA all strongly supported the resumption of this assistance,” referring to Ukraine aid held up by the US.
Among those relaying this information, Taylor said he was told by Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent and Tim Morrison, the top Russia and Europe adviser on President Donald Trump’s National Security Council.
Taylor also noted that he “had known from earlier conversations with people that (John Bolton) was also trying with the two secretaries and the Director of the CIA to get this reversed. So he confirmed that and urged me to make my concerns known to the Secretary again.”
In his opening statement, Taylor had relayed that Bolton wanted him to send a cable to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
“It was he who suggested then at that meeting that I write this note to Secretary Pompeo, which I did the next day,” Taylor said in testimony. “He indicated that he was very sympathetic.”
Link Copied!
Taylor said he learned from Hill staffer that Ukraine aid was unfrozen
From CNN's Jenny Hansler
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Bill Taylor, the top US diplomat in Ukraine, said he heard that military assistance to Ukraine had been unfrozen in an email from a Senate Armed Services Committee staffer on Sept. 11.
“It was September 11th. So, yeah, I remember getting an email from a staffer, a Senate Armed Services Committee staffer. And of course Senate staffers House staffers too, I’m sure get the word much earlier than anybody else. And so i got this email, I think it was probably overnight, which I then sent to Tim Morrison and I think maybe to George Kent saying: ‘Oh, this is great news. This is what we’ve been waiting for.’ And Tim hadn’t heard it yet. So that’s how I first heard. And then he later that day confirmed,” Taylor told the House committees.
Link Copied!
White House beefs up staff to fight impeachment
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins
The White House is adding two new aides to its ranks as it battles House Democrats in their impeachment inquiry.
Tony Sayegh, the former senior Treasury aide, and Pam Bondi, the former Florida attorney general, are both expected to start in the coming days — both on a temporary basis.
It’s a tacit acknowledgement from the White House that, despite denials, they needed to bolster their communications staff. The details are still being finalized but offers have been made.
Link Copied!
Taylor said Trump wanted Ukraine to announce investigations
From CNN's Kevin Liptak
OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP/Getty Images
The top US diplomat in Ukraine told lawmakers it was his “clear understanding” that American financial assistance to Kiev wouldn’t come unless the country’s president said publicly he would investigate President Trump’s political rivals.
In his testimony last month, Bill Taylor told lawmakers his believed the money wouldn’t flow unless the investigations were announced publicly was derived from conversations with other senior US officials, including US ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland.
Taylor said Sondland told him repeatedly that Trump did not view the arrangement as a “quid pro quo.” But he said, “I observed that, in order to move forward on the security assistance, the Ukrainians were told by Ambassador Sondland that they had to pursue these investigations.”
Later, Taylor was pressed on how he knew the security assistance was conditioned on the announcement of the investigations. He acknowledged he never heard that from Trump himself.
“I didn’t hear it from the President. I can’t say what the President was thinking,” Taylor said.
He said he “had no conversations with the President.”
Link Copied!
Taylor testified that Trump hadn't sent congratulatory letter to Ukrainian president
From CNN's Adam Levine
Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor was hesitant about the job and noted that President Trump hadn’t even sent a congratulatory letter to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Link Copied!
Republican congressman slammed "lawless" Democratic-run inquiry during diplomat's testimony
From CNN's Marshall Cohen
Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, slammed the Democratic-run process at the beginning of diplomat Bill Taylor’s deposition, calling it a “lawless” proceeding.
Since that deposition in October, the House passed a resolution setting the rules for the impeachment inquiry.
Link Copied!
Bill Taylor was hesitant to take Ukraine job because of "snake pit" in DC and Kiev
From CNN's Adam Levine
Senior US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor told lawmakers he was hesitant to take the Ukraine job, saying he was concerned it was a “snake pit” in Washington, DC, and Kiev.
“All to say that I was concerned that there was I think I put it a snake pit in Kyiv and a snake pit here, and I was not sure that I could usefully serve in that context,” he said, according to the transcript.
Link Copied!
Bill Taylor's testimony transcript is out
House committees have released the transcript from Bill Taylor’s testimony. We’re going through the document now, and we’ll post highlights here when we get them.
The senior US diplomat in Ukraine testified behind closed doors as part of the House impeachment inquiry on Oct. 22.
Today, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff announced that Taylor will testify in an open hearing next Wednesday.
Link Copied!
GOP senator on Sondland's reversed testimony: "People's memories of the same event varies"
From CNN's From Ali Zaslav
Sen. Ron Johnson downplayed US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland’s testimony reversal when speaking to reporters today.
The Wisconsin senator said that “people’s memories of the same event varies” and added that he doesn’t find it “overly surprising” that somebody, like Sondland, would hear new information and change their recollection.
Johnson added that he is also “trying to recall” exactly what happened in these meetings and told reporters an example that shows a disparity between his and Sondland’s memory.
Some background: On Monday, Sondland revised his testimony to impeachment investigators to admit a quid pro quo linking US aid to Ukraine with an investigation into President Trump’s political rivals.
Link Copied!
Lindsey Graham on identifying the whistleblower: "You can't be prosecuted based on an anonymous accusation"
From CNN's Jake Lubbehusen and Suzanne Malveaux
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC), speaks after introducing a resolution condemning the House Impeachment inquiry on October 24, 2019.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Sen. Lindsey Graham just spoke with reporters outside of the Senate Judiciary Committee about the ongoing impeachment investigation.
Graham said that the anonymous whistleblower’s name should be made public because “you can’t be prosecuted based on an anonymous accusation. The only way you lose your property rights or your liberty rights in America is to have due process.”
The senator also called the impeachment process a “sham” and said the testimony presented in the impeachment investigation seems “to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo.”
He added that he expected Rudy Giuliani, who is at the center of the Trump administration’s dealings with Ukraine, to claim executive privilege and refuse to testify.
Echoing the Trump administration’s focus on the rough transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president, he said:
Remember: The White House released a transcript of the July call, but it’s only a rough log and not a word-for-word readout. The rough transcript shows Trump repeatedly pushed Ukraine’s president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
Link Copied!
Catch up: 4 developments today in the Trump impeachment inquiry
ERIC BARADAT/AFP/Getty Images
A lot of news has happened today in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.
Here’s what has happened so far and what we’re watching:
Public hearing dates set: Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman for the House Intelligence Committee, announced today that public hearings will start next week. Diplomats Bill Taylor and George Kent will testify next Wednesday, and former ambassador Marie Yovanovitch will testify next Friday.
Transcript to be released: Schiff said a transcript from the testimony of top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor, who testified last month in the impeachment probe, will be released today.
Official testifies: David Hale, a high-ranking State Department official, is testifying on Capitol Hill today behind closed doors. According to the AP, Hale intends to tell Congress that the Secretary of State was reluctant to defend his Ukraine ambassador because it would hurt efforts to get Ukraine military aid and there was worry about the reaction of Rudy Giuliani.
More no-shows likely: Four people are scheduled to testify today — but we’re only expecting Hale to speak to the committees. The other officials are Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Russ Vought, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, and State Department counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl.
Link Copied!
Republican congressman says State Department official testified that the suspension of foreign aid "is not a new thing"
From CNN's Manu Raju and Lauren Fox
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/Getty Images
Republican Rep. Mark Meadows spoke with reporters about what he heard from State Department official David Hale this morning during his testimony in the impeachment inquiry.
Meadows told reporters that Hale has “brought some new facts to the committees’ attention, and I think if I were to characterize it one way, it would be that the suspension of foreign aid and the evaluation of that is not a new thing.”
Link Copied!
Here are the witnesses who are not expected to show up for testimony today
House impeachment investigators have requested testimony from four people today — but we’re only expecting one to speak to the committees.
David Hale, a high-ranking State Department official, is the only official expected to show up for his testimony today.
The other scheduled witnesses are:
Energy Secretary Rick Perry: Last week, Perry stated that he would not participate in a closed-door deposition, but might testify publicly about his involvement in the Trump administration’s dealings with Ukraine. Perry was described by US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland as one of the “three amigos” leading US relations with Ukraine.
Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought: Vought, a Trump appointee, has been subpoenaed for his testimony but snubbed the impeachment investigation. “We are not going to be a part of any sham process that is designed to relitigate the last election,” he recently told Fox News.
State Department counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl: Brechbuhl is traveling with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to Germany, according to a pool report. The whistleblower complaint named Brechbuhl as someone who listened in on Trump’s July 25 call with the Ukrainian President.
Why this matters: The White House strategy so far has been to impede the impeachment investigation as much as possible by refusing subpoenas and calling the process itself illegitimate. Republican leadership has complained that the impeachment process is unfair and overly restrictive on their ability to question witnesses.
Link Copied!
Schiff: Open hearings will be an "opportunity for the American people to evaluate the witnesses for themselves"
House Intel Chair Adam Schiff announced today that public hearings will start next week in the impeachment inquiry.
Schiff said that diplomats Bill Taylor and George Kent will be the first witnesses to testify publicly next Wednesday.
Former ambassador Marie Yovanovitch will testify publicly next Friday, Schiff said.
Link Copied!
Transcripts from the top US diplomat in Ukraine's testimony will be released today
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff just announced that Congress will release a transcript from the testimony of top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor today.
About the testimony: Taylor testified last month that he had been told President Trump would withhold military aid to the country until it publicly declared investigations would be launched that could help his reelection chances — including into former Vice President Joe Biden, according to a copy of Taylor’s opening statement obtained by CNN.
Link Copied!
NOW: Adam Schiff is speaking
House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff just took a break form the deposition of David Hale, a high-ranking State Department official, to speak to reporters.
Moments ago, he tweeted that public hearings in the impeachment inquiry will begin next week.
Link Copied!
Public impeachment hearings will begin next week
From CNN's Jeremy Herb
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff tweeted that the committee “will hold its first open hearing” on Wednesday, November 13.
Schiff said that top diplomat William Taylor and Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent would testify then, followed by former US ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch on Friday, November 15.
Taylor currently serves as the Chargé D’affaires for the US State Department in Ukraine. Kent serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary in the European and Eurasian Bureau at the US Department of State.
Remember: Last week the House passed a resolution outlining the rules for public hearings and formalizing the impeachment process.
Link Copied!
Former Russia adviser's attorney says Sondland "fabricated" his discussions with her
From CNN's Manu Raju
Fiona Hill, former Special Assistant to U.S. President Donald Trump and Senior Director for European and Russian Affairs on the United States National Security Council, arrives on Capitol Hill on October 14 to testify in the impeachment inquiry.
Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images
A lawyer for Fiona Hill, Trump’s former top Russia adviser, says that Ambasador to the European Union Gordon Sondland “fabricated communication” with Hill in his testimony in the impeachment inquiry.
Hill’s attorney, Lee Wolosky, tweeted this morning that “Sondland has fabricated communications with Dr. Hill, none of which were over coffee.”
Wolosky continued: “Dr. Hill told Sondland what she told lawmakers — the lack of coordination on Ukraine was distastorous (sic), and the circumstances of the dismissal of Amb Yovanovitch shameful.”
What this is all about: According to Sondland’s testimony released yesterday, he told lawmakers he had coffee with Fiona Hill in July and that she was “pretty upset” about her role at the administration. Sondland added that Hill was “sort of shaking.”
Link Copied!
Pence's impeachment advice to Republican senators: Lean on the transcript
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins
Vice President Mike Pence walks to the Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
During a lunch with Republicans senators yesterday, Vice President Mike Pence had a piece of advice for the lawmakers in the room who have struggled with a viable defense strategy: Read the transcript.
The Vice President urged the lawmakers in the room to point out that the Trump administration has provided Ukraine with lethal aid and he advised them to simply refer back to the transcript when facing questions about the president’s conduct.
The advice is not new and comes as some senators have complained to the White House that they need a better defense strategy. It’s unclear if what he said yesterday will be sufficient.
Remember: The White House released a transcript of the July call, but it’s only a rough log and not a word-for-word readout. The rough transcript shows Trump repeatedly pushed Ukraine’s president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
Link Copied!
Kellyanne Conway: There was no quid pro quo, despite diplomat's testimony
From CNN's Betsy Klein
White House counselor Kellyanne Conway maintained there was no quid pro quo related to withheld military aid for Ukraine by President Trump — despite ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland’s amended testimony.
Asked if there was no quid pro quo, Conway said: “That is the White House’s position, and I don’t think that his latest revisions change that.”
Sondland, a Republican donor turned diplomat, reversed his testimony to say that a quid pro quo was needed from Kiev to free up military aid, according to documents released yesterday.
Conway continued:
Link Copied!
GOP congressman says EU ambassador's amended testimony about Ukraine quid pro quo is his "opinion"
From CNN's Shawna Mizelle
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan was asked about the transcripts released this week in the impeachment inquiry as he arrived for more testimony on Capitol Hill today.
On Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland stating in his amended testimony that he now believes that there was a quid pro quo related to withheld military aid for Ukraine by President Trump, Jordan said, “It is Sondland’s opinion.”
Jordan added:
Jordan called the testimony of special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker — released along with the Sondland transcript yesterday — in which Volker said he wasn’t aware of any quid pro quo the “definitive account on all this.”
“His account is consistent with the fundamental facts. There was nothing wrong on the call transcript,” Jordan added about Volker’s testimony.
Link Copied!
David Hale has arrived on Capitol Hill
David Hale, right, arrives on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, November 6.
Susan Walsh/AP
Impeachment witness David Hale has arrived on Capitol Hill for his deposition.
According to the AP, Hale intends to tell Congress that the Secretary of State was reluctant to defend his Ukraine ambassador because it would hurt efforts to get Ukraine military aid and there was worry about the reaction of Rudy Giuliani.
Link Copied!
A high-ranking State Department official is expected to testify today
One of the four witnesses scheduled to testify this morning will show up for his deposition.
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale is expected to appear this morning. He’ll tell investigators “that political considerations were behind the agency’s refusal to deliver a robust defense of the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine,” according to the AP.
Three more witnesses — Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and State Department counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl — were scheduled to testify today but are not expected to show.
Hale is a high-ranking official in the State Department. And he has a lot of foreign affairs experience: He was executive assistant to then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright during the Clinton administration and the director for Israel-Palestinian affairs from 2001 to 2003.
He became ambassador to Jordan in 2005. In 2008, he became deputy assistant secretary of state for Israel, Egypt and the Levant. He was deputy special envoy in 2009 and special envoy for Middle East peace from 2011 to 2013. He was US ambassador to Lebanon from 2013 until 2015, when he became ambassador to Pakistan.
Link Copied!
We're not sure what to expect today in the impeachment inquiry
What transcripts will be released today? We don’t yet know.
Who will testify? We don’t entirely know.
Investigators have requested testimony from four people today — but yesterday’s and Monday’s scheduled witnesses refused to show up.
Today’s scheduled witnesses are…
Energy Secretary Rick Perry
Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought
David Hale, a State Department official.
The House also requested testimony from State Department counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl, but he is instead traveling with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to Germany, according to a pool report.
Link Copied!
How Lindsey Graham reacted to a key diplomat's admission
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from south Carolina, responded to Gordon Sondland revising his testimony to impeachment investigators and admitting a quid pro quo linking US aid to Ukraine with an investigation into President Trump’s political rival.
“If the person being threatened with withholding the aid, if they say I wasn’t threatened, I don’t care what any bureaucrat says,” he added.
Watch more:
Link Copied!
Transcripts show Republicans are anything but sidelined in impeachment inquiry
From CNN's Kevin Liptak in Washington
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., speaks to reporters outside a secure area of the Capitol where Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a military officer at the National Security Council, arrived for a closed door meeting to testify as part of the House impeachment inquiry on October 29.
In a pattern established over four closed-door depositions whose transcripts were released this week, Republicans have used their allotted time to question the impeachment inquiry’s validity and accuse Democrats of shutting them out of the process.
But for all of the Republicans’ complaints about unfairness, the transcripts indicate they were fully involved in the questioning of witnesses during the sometimes-contentious closed door hearings. Over the course of the lengthy sittings, Republicans, Democrats and witnesses’ lawyers have clashed over the propriety of questions and the terms of the proceedings.
It mirrors their public attempts to discount the impeachment probe, including an attempt to storm the secure hearing room where the depositions have occurred.
The transcripts provide the fullest picture yet of the closed depositions, which have occurred over long days inside a stuffy room in the basement of the US Capitol. As the inquiry enters a more public phase, the back-and-forth that transpired in private provides a likely preview of upcoming open hearings, where procedural matters and questions of the impeachment probe’s legitimacy are likely to arise.
In testimony released by impeachment investigators, the US ambassador to the European Union also testified that he assumed it would be “illegal” for Trump’s fixer and personal attorney Rudy Giuliani to push Ukraine to investigate the President’s political opponents.
Sondland’s adjusted testimony did much to dismantle the President’s core and repeated defense: that he did not hold up aid to Kiev to force it to open a probe into Joe Biden and that any suggestion to the contrary is simply the “crazed” delusion of “Never Trumpers.”
How the White House responded to the Sondland and Volker transcripts
From CNN's Betsy Klein
Here is the response from White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham in full following the transcript releases of US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker:
Link Copied!
A diplomat suddenly remembers the quid pro quo
Analysis by CNN's Zachary B. Wolf
In a stunning reversal that further confirms the notion of a quid pro quo, US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland says that after he first testified, he began to remember fresh details about a link between US security aid and Ukrainian investigations of President Donald Trump’s political rival Joe Biden.
Sondland filed and the House Intelligence Committee released a three-page sworn addendum to congressional testimony Tuesday in which he said that reading testimony from other witnesses reminded him of some key details. Here they are:
The conversation – He does now recall telling a Ukrainian official on September 1 that military and security aid was directly tied to a public commitment from Ukraine to investigate meddling in the 2016 US election and, separately, Burisma, the company that put Hunter Biden on its board.
The text message – September 1 is the same day Bill Taylor, the top US official who was raising the alarm in Ukraine, texted Sondland the message, “Are we now saying that security assistance and White House meeting are conditioned on investigations?” Sondland replied then with a “call me.”
The Warsaw meeting – He transmitted this message to a Ukrainian political aide, Andriy Yermak, on the sidelines of a meeting in Warsaw between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Vice President Mike Pence.
Conditions for release of aid – The public statement would have to come straight from Ukraine’s President, but Sondland can’t remember if it was Rudy Giuliani, the President’s personal lawyer or Kurt Volker, the US special envoy for Ukraine who told him that.
Memory still fuzzy – He can’t remember how many times he talked to President Trump between September 6-9, when he texted “no quid pro quo” to Taylor.
Cut off – The White House won’t give him access to phone logs so he can figure it out.
Sondland is the GOP donor and political appointee who was in direct contact at times with Trump about Ukraine. And now he remembers what amounts to a direct quid pro quo, although he still can’t remember everything.
Link Copied!
Catch up: 4 developments in the impeachment inquiry you need to know
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Here are the latest developments in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump:
Sondland’s testimony: USAmbassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, a key witness who spoke with the President about his intentions in Ukraine, told the House committees he believed Rudy Giuliani’s push for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens was potentially illegal, according to excerpts of transcripts released yesterday. Sondland also admitted to House committees that he eventually became aware that Ukraine aid was held up to entice Ukrainian corruption investigations, and eventually realized the investigation was linked to the Bidens.
Volker’s testimony: Former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker told impeachment investigators he was surprised and troubled by Trump’s phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart in July, which is at the center of the impeachment inquiry, according to transcripts of his testimony released yesterday. Volker also told lawmakers that the Ukrainians didn’t know about the holdup of military assistance until after the Trump administration stopped pressing them to announce an investigation into the Bidens.
Quid pro quo: In his testimony, according to the transcripts, Sondland said he realized on September 1 that Trump and Giuliani wanted a quid pro quo with Ukraine – and later, when it became even clearer, was “alarmed” about what the President wanted.
Mick Mulvaney requested: House impeachment investigators have requested acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney testify on Capitol Hill on Friday. The House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees sent Mulvaney a letter today requesting he appear for a closed-door deposition as part of the impeachment inquiry into Trump and Ukraine.