President Donald Trump arrives at SNHU Arena to speak at a campaign rally, Monday, Feb. 10, 2020, in Manchester, N.H. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
CNN reporter: This Trump claim is egregiously false
03:25 - Source: CNN
Washington CNN  — 

President Donald Trump, ever the reality television star, had been hinting that a big reveal was coming.

Trump ran for the presidency on a signature promise to make Mexico pay for a giant wall on its own border. Mexico has not paid. But Trump insisted at campaign rallies in January that, at some point in the future, people would learn how Mexico has indeed been paying.

At a rally in New Hampshire on Monday, he offered something resembling an explanation.

“You do know who’s paying for the wall, don’t you? Redemption. From illegal aliens that are coming in,” he said. “The redemption money is paying for the wall.”

Facts First: Experts on immigration policy told CNN they had no idea what the term “redemption money” means. Trump is paying for the wall with a combination of US taxpayer money Congress has allocated to the project and funding he is diverting from the military.

“I don’t know what the President means by redemptions. I have never heard the word used in this context before,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor of immigration law practice at Cornell University. “In any event, the President is wrong. Money appropriated by Congress and money diverted from the Department of Defense is paying for construction of the wall, not immigrants.”

At CNN, we start with the facts. Visit CNN’s home for Facts First.

Four Migration Policy Institute researchers focused on the United States have also never “heard of the use of the term ‘redemption’ in the immigration context,” said Michelle Mittelstadt, the think tank’s communications director.

Mittelstadt said the researchers surmised Trump might have meant to refer to remittances, money that immigrants send back to people in their countries of origin, but she emphasized that they weren’t sure.

Theresa Cardinal Brown, director of immigration and cross-border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, also said Trump could perhaps have been thinking of remittances and misspoke, though she too said she doesn’t know – and that Trump might not know himself.

Regardless, Brown said, there is no magical mechanism, related to remittances or anything else, by which Mexico is paying for the wall.

“I have absolutely no idea what he means by that. Clearly the US is paying for the wall,” she said.

The White House and the Trump campaign did not respond to requests for an explanation of “redemption money.”

Trump’s team has previously invoked remittances in the context of wall funding.

A plan released by Trump’s 2016 campaign said that, until Mexico paid for the wall, he would “impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages.” And at a press conference just before he took office, he floated the idea of “a tax” or “a payment” to get Mexico to pay for the wall, raising Mexican concerns about the fate of remittances. (Remittances to Mexico, which mostly come from people in the US, hit a record $36 billion in 2019, Mexico’s central bank says.)

But none of these proposals was implemented.

Instead, Trump has funded wall construction by taking billions from military coffers to augment billions appropriated by Congress.

In January, CNN and other media outlets reported that Trump was considering diverting another $7.2 billion from the military – $3.7 billion from military construction projects and $3.5 billion from counterdrug programs.

As Trump has repeatedly noted, Mexico has helped the US on immigration by deploying thousands of troops to thwart migrants. It’s possible to argue that this is kind of like Mexico paying for a wall. Nonetheless, Trump’s wall is an actual, physical project Mexico has not funded.