Live Updates: European Super League planned by 12 soccer giants intent on shaking up ‘beautiful game’ | CNN

European Super League: 12 soccer giants intent on shaking up ‘beautiful game’

LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND - APRIL 14:  Trent Alexander-Arnold of Liverpool controls the ball during the UEFA Champions League Quarter Final Second Leg match between Liverpool FC and Real Madrid at Anfield on April 14, 2021 in Liverpool, England. Sporting stadiums around the UK remain under strict restrictions due to the Coronavirus Pandemic as Government social distancing laws prohibit fans inside venues resulting in games being played behind closed doors.  (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
European soccer clubs announce breakaway 'Super League'
03:14 - Source: CNN

What we covered here

  • On Sunday, 12 of Europe’s leading football clubs announced plans to form a so-called European Super League.
  • The plans have been condemned by fans, politicians, former players and the sport’s regulators, throwing the elite game into turmoil.
  • The clubs involved are Premier League teams Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Tottenham Hotspur, Serie A clubs AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus, and Spanish clubs Atlético Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid.
  • The group plans to begin the new competition “as soon as is practicable,” but risk being thrown out of other tournaments if they do.
30 Posts

The end of a seismic day for European football

A picture shows Spanish football club Barcelona's Camp Nou stadium in Barcelona on April 19, 2021. 

Sunday’s announcement that 12 ‘founding member’ teams would be breaking away from current UEFA competitions shook European football to its core.

The move was met with widespread condemnation from fans, politicians and leading figures in football.

Here is a list of everything you need to know about an explosive 24 hours that may have changed the sport forever.

Who controls the 12 European Super League members

Here’s a handy guide to who is in charge of the 12 clubs looking to shake up European football.

Bayern Munich CEO says his club weren't involved in Super League plans and backs current system

Bayern Munich’s CEO has criticized the European Super League, insisting that the continent’s top teams should stay within the current structure and seemingly dealing a blow to the breakaway tournament’s hopes of recruiting the German giant.

Karl-Heinz Rummenigge said in a statement that his club “has not been involved in the plans for creating a Super League” and is instead “convinced that the current structure in football guarantees a reliable foundation.”

Karl-Heinz Rummenigge, CEO of FC Bayern München, in October 2020.

The team, along with Paris Saint-Germain, are European football’s most notable holdouts from the competition.

Rummenigge said he supports UEFA’s plans to expand the Champions League rather than form a new tournament

“Bayern welcomes the reforms of the Champions League because we believe they are the right step to take for the development of European football. The modified group stage will contribute to an increase in excitement and the emotional experience in the competition,” he said.

And he added that the Super League was not the answer to the financial problems facing clubs. “I do not believe the Super League will solve the financial problems of European clubs that have arisen as result of the coronavirus pandemic.

“Rather, all clubs in Europe should work in solidarity to ensure that the cost structure, especially players’ salaries and agents’ fees, are brought in line with revenues, to make all of European football more rational,” Rummenigge said.

What is the new European Super League and how will it work?

A combination of logos of the European football clubs involved in the European Super League.

Football fans, politicians and governing bodies are united in fury after 12 of the sport’s biggest teams announced plans to breakaway from European football competitions and form their own “Super League” – a move that poses an existential threat to the world’s favorite sport.

CNN’s Steven Poole explains everything you need to know about the plans – and why they matter – here.

Shock and outrage as world reacts to European Super League breakaway plans

The news of plans for 12 of Europe’s top football teams to break away and form a European Super League has shocked and outraged the footballing and wider world.

While fan groups for the clubs themselves expressed their opposition to the plans and threatened to forego their support of their club – The Arsenal Supporters’ Trust called the club’s agreement to join “the death of Arsenal as a sporting institution” – clubs outside the 12 had their say.

22-time Russian Premier League winners Spartak Moscow offered to welcome fans of the proposed European Super League members if they choose to jump ship.

“Dear AC Milan, Arsenal, Atlético, Chelsea, Barcelona, Internazionale, Juventus, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Real Madrid and Tottenham fans,” it wrote on Twitter.

“If you need a new club to support, we’re always here for you.”

Read more from CNN’s Ben Morse on the global outrage here.

Premier League to discuss Super League proposal on Tuesday; ‘Big Six’ clubs not invited

The English Premier League will hold a virtual meeting with 14 of its 20 clubs on Tuesday to discuss the proposed European Super League.

The EPL’s so-called ‘Big Six’ clubs who are part of the proposal – Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur – have not been invited to attend.

The meeting, which will be chaired by Premier League CEO Richard Masters, will discuss both the current situation at play and proposed next steps.

Amid a wave of criticism, an agent reveals he supports Super League

There haven’t been many advocates for the European Super League, but Anglo-Italian agent Michael Di Stefano, who has worked in football for more than 20 years, advising players and clubs, told CNN Sport that the proposal was worthy of more consideration.

Di Stefano said that “maybe now is the time for those clubs to try a different format,” criticizing UEFA for being “unwilling to embrace” changes to the Champions League or to offer a larger share of revenue to big teams.

“The European tournament models have become, or maybe have always been, quite predictable,” he said. “The last time a football team from outside of that ‘Big 12’ won (the Champions League) was Porto in 2003/2004, or going back further, Borussia Dortmund in 1996 or Ajax in 1994.”

He argued clubs should be allowed to find new revenue streams.

“Football clubs don’t really make money and many of them, if not most of them, run off a model of deferring debt until the next big paycheck comes in – and that seems to be OK with everyone, but it shouldn’t be.

“This step was always inevitable and if it doesn’t happen this time and just ends up being a negotiating tactic, fair play to the clubs for strong-arming UEFA,” he said.

“But if it does happen, this will be another Premier League moment, another time where the game evolved quicker than what most people had expected,” he added, referring to the introduction of England’s top tier of football in 1992.

“Kicking this idea into the long grass makes everybody feel comfortable but I’ve been long looking forward to it.”

But Di Stefano did raise concerns about the relegation-free nature of the proposed league, which would be unique to European football.

“There are going to be inherent problems with this: the carbon copying of the MLS League structure won’t win too much favour on this continent, (and) relegation is required in European football,” he said.

“Fear of failure is required in European football but with some good compromise and tweaking, I don’t see why it can’t be as exciting or if not, more exciting than the current UEFA run tournaments.

“I know this argument is not going to make me many friends,” admitted Di Stefano. “But I’m not gonna lie, I’m excited by it and how it will evolve on our great continent.”

“And in closing, if I might be so bold: the fans should take a long hard look at the governing body and ask them: how did you let this happen,” he said.

UEFA says players who take part in breakaway league will be banned from World Cup and Euros

UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin reiterated on Monday that any players involved in the proposed breakaway Super League will be banned from the World Cup and European Championships. 

The Slovenian pulled no punches in an extraordinary media briefing, which came after 12 of European football’s biggest clubs announced on Sunday their intention to form a breakaway competition.

UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin gave an extraordinary press briefing on Monday.

The 53-year-old thanked European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and French President Emmanuel Macron, who have voiced their disapproval of the planned League.

“Super League is only about money, money of the dozen, I don’t want to call them dirty dozen – but UEFA is about developing football, and about financing what should be financed, that our football, our culture, survives – and some people don’t understand it. 

“Solidarity is something that stays forever. For some people, solidarity doesn’t exist. Unity doesn’t exist. The only thing that exists is their pockets. Ultimately, we believe that these changes and the support structure we are implementing can protect what our sport is all about,” Čeferin added.

UEFA on Monday voted to approve new plans for an expanded and restructured Champions League to kick-in from the 2024-25 season.

The total number of teams participating will increase from 32 to 36 with the traditional group stage being remodelled into to a single league stage.

Football is in a "civil war" -- but fans can stop the Super League, says Tottenham Supporters' Trust

The Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London.

Football fans can stop the European Super League despite the beginning of a “civil war” within the sport, a board member of the Tottenham Hotspur supporters’ Trust has told CNN.

Tottenham were one of six English sides to announce they would take part in the new tournament, which has enraged fans and governing bodies of the sport.

Martin Buhagiar told CNN’s Becky Anderson that the club’s fans “feel betrayed” by the plan, hatched “without any consultation whatsoever with supporters – probably because they knew this would be the reaction.”

He urged fellow fans to put aside rivalries and work to stop the plans. “We feel that together football fans can stop this … We will be speaking to other supporters groups. This is a time for rivals to come together and fight together.”

“It’s all about pure greed,” he said of the plans.

Tottenham joined Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Liverpool and nearby rivals Arsenal in forming the competition.

Earlier on Monday, Tottenham parted ways with their manager Jose Mourinho after a disappointing run of form.

"R.I.P LFC": Liverpool fans lead Super League protest outside Anfield

Banners are placed outside of Anfield, home of Liverpool FC, by fans to protest against the team's decision to join the European Super League.

A number of Liverpool fans are feeling particularly aggrieved with the club’s choice to join the Super League.

There has been always a strong desire among fans that the club should represent the city of Liverpool, which has suffered its fair share of economic problems.

Since John W. Henry’s Fenway Sports Group took control of Liverpool, the club has trumpeted the slogan of “This Means More” as a way of showing fans this is a football team that is connected to its fanbase.

For many supporters, that idea now rings hollow.

Outside of Anfield, Liverpool’s stadium, fans led a protest against the club.

“Shame on you. R.I.P LFC. 1862-2021,” read one banner.

Another read: “LFC fans against European Super League.”

"I fear it will happen," says leading football writer on Super League breakaway

Author Michael Calvin speaks with CNN on Monday. 

Michael Calvin – author of the book ‘Whose Game is it Anyway?’ – says he fears the Super League will now likely go ahead.

“I would hope that the authorities are strident in their opposition,” he told CNN’s Amanda Davies and Alex Thomas.

“The English FA were essentially rendered impotent when they allowed the Premier League to essentially gain influence of the game in England.

“UEFA cannot afford to be marginalized in the same way, so I would say – I know it’s a romantic gesture perhaps – let the top six clubs in England go.”

Watch the full interview below.

5c462132-bfbf-4f61-b60a-55a627190910.mp4
02:27 - Source: cnn

Global players' union warns of Super League's impact on 'fabric and cultural identity of football'

The global players’ union FIFPro has warned of the impact the breakaway Super League could have on the “fabric and cultural identity of football.”

FIFPro, which is the worldwide representative organisation for 60,000 professional footballers, said the decision leaves players with “many concerns and questions” on their careers.

FIFA and UEFA have previously suggested players competing in the Super League could be banned from playing at the World Cup or European Championship.

“Football is built on its unique social and cultural heritage, which not only gives it an unparalleled relationship to its fans but also has created the engine to spread the professional game like no other sport,” FIFPro said in a statement.

“For this to be sustained, a healthy and solidarity-based cooperation between domestic and international competitions is critical. A new competition undermining this might cause irreparable damage.

“It is important to note that European football’s arrival at this point of potential disruption is a reflection of a governance in which some have enjoyed disproportionate powers and most others including those at the heart of the game – the players but also fans – are largely overlooked.

“Players continue to be used as assets and leverage in these negotiations. This is unacceptable for FIFPRO, our 64 national player associations and the 60,000 players we represent. We will vigorously oppose measures by either side that would impede the rights of players, such as exclusion from their national teams.”

Twelve teams throw the beautiful game into crisis: Everything you need to know about the European Super League

Football fans, politicians and governing bodies are united in fury after 12 of the sport’s biggest teams announced plans to breakaway from European football competitions and form their own “Super League” – a move that poses an existential threat to the world’s favorite sport.

Here’s a rundown of what you need to know about the plans, and why they matter.

What is the European Super League? The new competition would see 12 elite teams from across Europe start their own tournament, with no relegation or promotion, which they ultimately expect to expand to 20 clubs. Five teams would be allowed to qualify to join the competition each year.

The league is “intended to commence as soon as is practicable,” according to the announcement posted on the 12 clubs’ websites, and would likely see the teams quit or be banned from their current leagues.

Who’s behind the plans? Six English clubs – Arsenal, Chelsea Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Tottenham Hotspur – alongside three teams from Italy – AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus – and three from Spain – Atlético Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid – are behind the plans.

American investment bank JP Morgan confirmed to CNN on Monday that it will be financing the proposed tournament.

What’s the background? Owners of the world’s biggest clubs have long agitated for a bigger share of football’s TV revenues and other financial rewards, while the increasingly undeniable importance of money in the game has grated with more traditional supporters.

In recent decades, multi-billion dollar takeovers of several teams like Manchester City and Chelsea have widened the gap between football’s haves and have nots, and it’s extremely rare for a team outside the small group of elites to win a major league trophy.

That disparity has led to rumors of a “super league” for years, and some have suggested the clubs involved could be convinced to shelve the plans in favor of a financial compromise. But Sunday’s announcement is by far the closest football has ever come to such a drastic breakaway.

Why does this matter? A key principle of football is that trophies and success are based on competition, and that no team is assured its place among the football elite or protected from relegation. The “Super League” model shatters that centuries-old structure, introducing a closed tournament that only some of the world’s richest, most recognizable clubs are invited to.

The financial impact of the move on existing leagues and teams could be catastrophic; the Premier League, for example, would be devalued without its biggest names and could lose huge sums of money from TV deals. Even fans of lower league clubs fear the trickle down impact of the shift, especially after a pandemic that has left many teams in financial turmoil.

And for many fans, the idea is inherently opposed to the essence of football. Upset victories, competitions that see big teams take on lowly opponents, and fairytale stories such as Leicester City’s remarkable Premier League title success in 2016, would be ended if the world’s biggest teams left the established footballing universe in order to only play against each other.

As a result, the plans have achieved something rarely seen in sport – uniting fans of all teams, along with the sport’s governing bodies, in angry opposition.

What’s the response been? The governing bodies that run football have pulled no punches in response to the plans, releasing statements that condemn the European Super League and threaten consequences.

FIFA, the global governing body for football, denounced the formation of the Super League, saying it goes against FIFA’s core principles of solidarity, inclusivity, integrity and equitable financial redistribution.

UEFA – which oversees all European football – along with the English, Spanish, and Italian governing bodies and the top flight leagues from those three countries co-signed an angry statement promising to “stop this cynical project … a project that is founded on the self-interest of a few clubs at a time when society needs solidarity more than ever.”

“We will consider all measures available to us, at all levels, both judicial and sporting in order to prevent this happening. Football is based on open competitions and sporting merit; it cannot be any other way,” the groups said.

Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson, meanwhile, said the league “would strike at the heart of the domestic game.”

What would happen if the league goes ahead? Given the angry stances that FIFA, UEFA and the existing leagues have taken, it appears unlikely that teams would be allowed to take part in the Super League and keep their spot in their respective domestic leagues as well.

In a statement issued in January, after rumors of the new Super League began circulating, FIFA said that it would not recognize the breakaway organization and went so far as to say that “any club or player involved in such a competition would as a consequence not be allowed to participate in any competition organized by FIFA or their respective confederation.”

That would mean that many of the world’s best players couldn’t play for their country – and would leave the next World Cup without stars like Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Kevin De Bruyne and many more.

Former players label Super League 'greedy and callous' and call for points deductions

Former footballers Luis Figo and Gary Neville

Former Portugal international Luis Figo, considered one of the best midfielders of his generation, said the new plans for a Super League were “greedy and callous.”

Figo played for Barcelona, Real Madrid and Inter Milan – three of the Super League’s 12 ‘founding members’ – and he warned of its potential impact on the sport.

Former Manchester United star Gary Neville – who has been publicly critical of his old club since the announcement – went a step further and suggested those involved should face punishments in their respective domestic leagues.

Football fans find humor in their anger, mocking Super League clubs and firing some parting shots at Jose Mourinho

Tottenham Hotspur has confirmed that Jose Mourinho has been "relieved of his duties."

The Super League’s founding clubs were at the sharp end of plenty of humor amid widespread anger at the proposed new competition.

A viral opinion piece for local British newspaper the News and Star, listing the “Reasons why a European Super League would be great for football,” got to the point: “There aren’t any. End of article.”

Plenty of fans also took a dig at Jose Mourinho, whose dismissal from Tottenham Hotspur came hours after the club confirmed they were planning to join the league.

“Jose Mourinho is fired. He is the first of the European Super League managers to lose their job,” former England striker Gary Lineker wrote.

“Harsh to sack Mourinho just after he qualified Spurs for the European Super League,” journalist Henry Mance joked.

‘I cannot remain silent:’ Soccer stars outspoken in criticizing Super League plans 

PSG's Ander Herrera has condemned the new Super League plans.

Paris Saint-Germain midfielder Ander Herrera has become one of the first top players to speak out against the new plans. 

PSG, backed by wealthy Qatari owners, is not one of the 12 founding members of the Super League.

Writing on Twitter, Herrera said: “I fell in love with popular football, with the football of the fans, with the dream of seeing the team of my heart compete against the greatest.

“If this European super league advances, those dreams are over, the illusions of the fans of the teams that are not giants of being able to win on the field competing in the best competitions will end.

“I love football and I cannot remain silent about this, I believe in an improved Champions League but not in the rich stealing what the people created, which is nothing other than the most beautiful sport on the planet.” 

Former Arsenal and current Fenerbahce midfielder Mesut Ozil echoed Herrera’s criticisms.

“Kids grow up dreaming to win the World Cup and the Champions League - not any Super League,” Ozil tweeted. 

“The enjoyment of big games is that they only happen once or twice a year, not every week. Really hard to understand for all football fans out there.” 

La Liga strongly condemns 'selfish, egotistical' proposed European Super League

La Liga says it “strongly condemns” the newly-proposed Super League, calling it an “elitist European competition that attacks the principles of open competition and sporting merit which are at the heart of the domestic and European football pyramid.”

The Super League’s 15 top clubs would be immune to relegation from the competition, a principle feature that makes football around the world so competitive.

Under current rules of relegation and promotion based on on-the-field performance, any club in the football pyramid can hope to one day compete against the powerhouse teams in the top division.

Barcelona and Real Madrid, along with Atletico, are among the Super League's 'founding members.'

“La Liga defends this European tradition of football for all,” it added. “The concept proposed by 12 European clubs destroys that dream, shutting the door to the top of European football, allowing in just an elite few.

“La Liga has a proud, 90-year history as an open, merit-based competition. Millions of fans around the world follow the 42 clubs of La Liga Santander and La Liga SmartBank. 

“The newly proposed top European competition is nothing more than a selfish, egotistical proposal designed to further enrich the already super rich. It will undermine the appeal of the whole game and have a deeply damaging impact on the immediate and future of La Liga, its member clubs, and all the entire footballing ecosystem.”

La Liga also warned that this “destruction of the European football ecosystem will also ultimately cause the failure of this new competition and its participating clubs.”

934adba6-8cee-40e0-9d2a-caa9b87737dc.mp4
01:50 - Source: cnn

Six English teams will have 'helped kill' the Premier League 'golden goose,' finance expert warns

There are likely to be severe consequences for future Premier League television deals if six of its biggest clubs join the European Super League, an expert on money in football has warned.

Nick Harris, who runs the website sportingintelligence, said on Twitter it is “hard to quantify how significantly” the rupture in European football would diminish the league’s lucrative TV deals, but that “the 6 will have helped kill their own golden goose,” he wrote.

He cited the decreased jeopardy in Premier League matches, with only the threat of relegation or the promise of qualification to a weaker Champions League to play for.

“How much are broadcasters going to pay for (the Champions League) without 15 of the biggest clubs in Europe involved? A fraction of now,” he added.

US money men, a Russian oligarch and a sheikh are among owners of 12 breakaway clubs

The 12 clubs plotting a breakaway from the European football structure are controlled by a wide array of mega-rich owners, many of whom have investments in other sports teams around the world.

Three of the six British teams involved have American owners. The Glazer family, which also owns the reigning NFL champion Tampa Bay Buccanneers, has run Manchester United since businessman Malcom Glazer, who died in 2014, bought the team in 2005. John W. Henry, founder of the Fenway Sports Group that owns the MLB’s Boston Red Sox, is at the helm of Liverpool. And Stan Kroenke’s holding company is behind Arsenal and a host of US franchises – the most lucrative being the NFL’s LA Rams and the NBA’s Denver Nuggets.

Liverpool owner John W. Henry ahead of the Premier League match between Liverpool FC and Norwich City in 2019.

Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich took over Chelsea in 2003 and his subsequent investment in transfers elevated the club to the top of the British game. A similar move by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, helped Manchester City climb into the football elite. Tottenham are the only British-owner Premier League team involved in the plans; British billionaire Joe Lewis is at the helm of that team.

Spanish giants Real Madrid and Barcelona follow a presidential model that is largely unique within European football. Individuals run in hotly contested elections, voted for by the club’s members, and are required to put hefty financial backing into the clubs if elected. Construction mogul Florentino Perez has been Real Madrid’s President since 2009. Joan Laporta took over at the helm of Barcelona last month, after the tumultuous term of Josep Maria Bartomeu led to fears among fans that superstar Lionel Messi would leave the team.

Florentino Perez has been in charge at Real Madrid since 2009.

Atlético Madrid use a more traditional model; businessman Miguel Ángel Gil Marín owns a majority share in that team.

Inter Milan’s Chinese owners, the Suning Holdings Group chaired by Zhang Jindong, took over from the Italian Moratti family in 2016. Their local rivals AC Milan have US owners; the investment firm Elliott Management Corporation, run by hedge fund manager Paul Singer, is behind the side.

Juventus, unlike most of the teams involved, have been owned by the industrialist Agnelli family for nearly a century. That group’s fortunes were built on the back of the Fiat automobile firm, founded by Giovanni Agnelli in 1899.

"War:" European media widely condemns proposed Super League

Newspapers across Europe have widely condemned the proposed Super League, waging “war” against those who have backed the move. 

Premier League teams Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Tottenham, Arsenal and Liverpool have been labeled the “shameless six” by British newspapers, with the Metro calling it a “Civil War”. 

The Mirror called the new league a “criminal act against fans,” while The Telegraph suggested those teams backing a breakaway will face expulsion from domestic competitions. 

In France, L’Equipe called it a “war of the rich” and criticized the clubs’ owners for their greed, while Spanish paper AS labeled the news a “bombshell.” 

Italian newspapers were a little more subdued, focusing on the “birth” of the Super League with Corriere dello Sport calling it a “football revolution.”