Final 12 jurors chosen by lottery in the Rittenhouse trial
From CNN's Mike Hayes
A raffle drum, that will be used to pick the numbers of the alternate jurors who will be excused when the Kyle Rittenhouse case goes to the jury, sits in the courtroom on Friday, Nov. 12, 2021 in Kenosha, Wis. Judge Bruce Schroeder told jurors that he would select as many names as necessary from the tumbler to go from 18 down to 12 jurors.
(Mark Hertzberg/Pool/AP)
The 12 jurors who will deliberate the case and reach a verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial have been selected.
This morning, before deliberations begin, six of the 18 jurors who heard the case were selected during a lottery held in the courtroom. The 18 potential jurors heard the evidence and testimony in the case so that alternates were available if jurors needed to be dismissed.
All the jurors’ numbers were loaded into a tumbler and mixed around. Defendant Kyle Rittenhouse selected six numbers from the batch.
The jurors whose numbers he selected were sent out of the courtroom. They will continue to serve as alternates. The clerk read off their numbers after Rittenhouse made his selections.
Rittenhouse reaches into the tumbler to pull out a juror number on Tuesday.
(Pool)
“As I call your number, please stand up. Number 11. Number 58. Number 14. Number 45. Number 9. Number 52. Then if you’ll follow the bailiff into the back room,” the clerk said.
The 12 jurors are now beginning deliberations in the case. The alternates will remain at the courthouse during deliberations.
Link Copied!
Jury in Rittenhouse trial will begin deliberations today
The jury in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse will begin deliberations today.
The panel of 18 jurors, eight men and 10 women, will be narrowed down to the 12 by a random drawing using a raffle tumbler this morning. The 12 jurors selected randomly will then deliberate the case.
On Monday, jurors were asked to report back to court at 10 a.m. ET today.
Link Copied!
Key moments from dueling closing arguments in the Rittenhouse trial
From CNN's Eric Levenson, Carma Hassan and Brad Parks
Defense attorney Mark Richards gives his closing argument in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Monday.
(Sean Krajacic/Pool/Getty Images)
Kyle Rittenhouse provoked the fatal shootings in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year by pointing his AR-15-style weapon at Joseph Rosenbaum, prosecutors said Monday in closing arguments of his homicide trial.
In response, defense attorney Mark Richards said Rittenhouse did not act recklessly when he fatally shot Rosenbaum, who Richards argued had threatened him, chased him, thrown a plastic bag at him and lunged for his gun.
The dueling closing arguments, which took up most of Monday, came at the end of a two-week trial highlighted by emotional and illuminating testimony from Rittenhouse himself, who said he acted in self-defense when he fatally shot Rosenbaum.
A crowd of people then pursued the teenager, and Rittenhouse testified he shot in self-defense at a man who tried to kick him; fatally shot Anthony Huber, who had hit him with a skateboard; and shot Gaige Grosskreutz, who was armed with a pistol. Rosenbaum and Huber were killed, and Grosskreutz was wounded.
The group of 18 jurors will be narrowed to 12 this morning and will then begin deliberating in the case.
Earlier Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed a misdemeanor weapons charge against Rittenhouse, now 18. He still faces five felony charges and, if convicted on the most serious charge, could face a mandatory sentence of life in prison.
Schroeder also read a set of legal instructions to the jury members and informed them they will be allowed to consider lesser included offenses for two of the five counts.
The trial featured more than a dozen videos from the night of August 25, 2020, showing what happened before, during and after the shootings. Most of the facts of what happened that night were not up for debate — rather, the heart of the trial was the analysis of Rittenhouse’s actions and whether they can be considered “reasonable.”
Here's what happened Monday in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial
(Pool)
Both the prosecution and defense delivered their closing arguments Monday in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, a teenager who faces homicide charges in the fatal shooting during protests last summer following the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
Prosecutors argued Rittenhouse had a part in creating the volatile and dangerous situation in Kenosha on Aug. 25, 2020 and said he had multiple opportunities to either flee to safety or use non-lethal means of defense.
Rittenhouse’s defense team, meanwhile, argued Rittenhouse’s actions were justified, saying he had been under assault from the victims he shot.
The jury will begin deliberations on Tuesday, Judge Bruce Schroeder told the court Monday evening. The panel of 18 jurors — 8 men and 10 women — will be narrowed down to the 12 who will deliberate the case by a random drawing using a raffle tumbler Tuesday morning.
Jurors were asked to report back to court at 10 a.m. ET tomorrow.
If you’re just catching up, here’s what happened in court Monday:
Judge dismisses gun charge against Rittenhouse: Schroeder dismissed Count 6 of the indictment against Rittenhouse, a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. The charge was punishable by up to nine months in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Prosecutors argue Rittenhouse can’t claim self-defense on “a danger you create”: The assistant district attorney argued that video shows that Rittenhouse provoked the fatal encounter with Rosenbaum, and suggested he should never been at protests armed because it wasn’t a situation in which he was “protecting his home or his family.”
Prosecutors say Rittenhouse could have fled: Prosecutor Thomas Binger said during his closing argument that Rittenhouse should have continued to run away instead of shooting Rosenbaum.
Prosecutors say Rittenhouse lied to the press and bystanders: Binger called Rittenhouse “a fraud” who lied to the press, saying that he was a certified EMT. He also accused Rittenhouse of lying to bystanders after shooting Rosenbaum by claiming the victim “pulled a gun.”
Defense accuses prosecution of “lying”: Early in it’s closing statements, the defense argued prosecutors had mischaracterized Rittenhouse’s role in the violence in Kenosha telling the jury that the Binger was “lying” and “misrepresenting” the evidence when he said the defendant provoked violence. Defense attorney Mark Richards said Rittenhouse “was taking off” when shooting victim Rosenbaum and others started chasing him.
Defense says Rittenhouse was under attack: Richards said that before Rittenhouse shot Anthony Huber, the shooting victim “strikes him in the head” and was going for a “second lick.” He also said Rosenbaum was “leaping” and “lunging” at Rittenhouse when he shot him.
Defense points at victims and protesters: The defense also made a number of statements about those present at the protests, calling them rioters and saying that Gaige Grosskreutz, who was shot and wounded that night, should have “retreated” and not confronted Rittenhouse.
Link Copied!
Rittenhouse jury begins deliberations tomorrow. Here's what we expect.
From CNN's Brad Parks
(Pool)
The jury in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse will begin deliberations on Tuesday, Judge Bruce Schroeder told the court Monday evening, following a full day of instructions and closing arguments in the case.
The panel of 18 jurors — 8 men and 10 women — will be narrowed down to the 12 who will deliberate the case by a random drawing using a raffle tumbler Tuesday morning.
Jurors were asked to report back to court at 10 a.m. ET Tuesday.
Link Copied!
Judge tells Rittenhouse jury to "pay no heed to the opinions of anyone"
Following the end of closing arguments, Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder told the jurors they must “determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty as to each of the offenses charged or submitted.”
Deliberations in the Kyle Rittenhouse case will begin tomorrow. Rittenhouse, the armed Illinois teenager who killed two people and wounded another during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last summer, is on trial on homicide charges.
Link Copied!
Prosecution concludes rebuttal, saying Rittenhouse was "the only imminent threat that night"
From CNN's Josiah Ryan
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney James Kraus concluded his rebuttal for the state by saying Kyle Rittenhouse’s actions could not be considered reasonable self-defense.
“The defense’s whole case has been trying to stoke sympathy for Mr. Rittenhouse and showing how everybody else was a terrible person,” said Kraus, bringing his rebuttal of the defense’s closing argument to a close.
“The only imminent threat that night was Mr. Rittenhouse,” he concluded. “He was not acting in legal, justified self-defense. He is guilty.”
Link Copied!
Rittenhouse jurors' attention appears to be waning as closings spill into the evening
As closing arguments spilled into Monday evening in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, “the attention of jurors waned,” according to a pool reporter in court. Some were seen “fidgeting, shifting in their jury-box chairs” and “their eyes surveying the courtroom.”
As prosecutor James Kraus continues his rebuttal, several jurors were seen resting their hands on their chins or rubbing their eyes. “At least one seemed to struggle to stay awake,” according to the pool reporter.
Kraus’ rebuttal is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Prosecution begins rebuttal in Rittenhouse trial
From CNN's Josiah Ryan
(Pool)
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney James Kraus began the rebuttal for the state saying it was unreasonable for Kyle Rittenhouse to respond to threats by using deadly force.
Prosecutors told the court earlier they estimated their rebuttal remarks would last about 30 minutes.
Kraus went on to argue that the perceived threat to Rittenhouse’s did not meet the standard under Wisconsin law that would justify the use of deadly force.
“The standard is the defendant may intentionally use force, which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm, such as firing an AR-15, only if the defendant reasonably believed that the force used was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself,” said Kraus.
Kraus said Rittenhouse should have “exhausted all methods” of self-defense before shooting.
“Punch him in the face, kick him in the testicles, knee him in the face, hit him with your gun,” he said. “You don’t just immediately get to shoot someone … It is not reasonable for any adult … to not try and defend yourself first using other methods.”
Link Copied!
Court takes a break following defense's closing arguments
From CNN's Josiah Ryan
The court is in a short break for 10 minutes.
Defense attorney Mark Richards just wrapped up his closing argument in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, saying his client had acted in self-defense and that his actions are protected under Wisconsin law.
Prosecutors will now have a chance to give a rebuttal.
Link Copied!
The defense wraps up its closing arguments
Defense attorney Mark Richards just wrapped up his closing arguments in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse, now 18, faces homicide charges for killing two people and wounding another during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last summer. The defense has argued throughout the trial that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
“Every person who was shot was attacking Kyle,” Richards said.
Link Copied!
Defense says prosecution was unable to damage Rittenhouse's credibility in cross-examination
From CNN's Josiah Ryan
(Pool)
Defense attorney Mark Richards praised Kyle Rittenhouse’s lengthy testimony before the jury last week, saying the prosecution had not managed to damage his client’s credibility.
“Could Mr. Binger pick on him and find little things about it? A little bit,” said Richards, referring to lead prosecutor in the case against 18-year-old Rittenhouse, Thomas Binger. “A little bit.”
“Did he damage his credibility?” continued Richards. “I don’t think so.”
Richards went on to say Rittenhouse had made the decision to testify in his own defense — a move often considered risky in criminal trials, because he wanted the jury to hear his perspective of what happened that night.
“Kyle Rittenhouse did not have the take the witness stand to tell his story,” said Richards. “It was told through video. He wanted you, as the jurors, to hear his personal experience of the night of the 25th.”
“He knew Mr. Binger would cross examine him for hours, and he was willing to get up on that witness stand, take the oath, and tell his story the best way he could, and he did,” Richards added.
Link Copied!
Defense attorney says Rittenhouse wasn't looking for trouble when he went to Kenosha
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Defense attorney Mark Richards told the jury that Kyle Rittenhouse was not looking for trouble when he went to Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020. Rather, he said his client “feels for this community.”
Rittenhouse, the armed Illinois teenager who killed two people and wounded another during unrest in Kenosha last summer, is on trial on homicide charges.
Link Copied!
Defense attorney argues that people were "rioting" before Rittenhouse shooting
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Defense attorney Mark Richards aimed to poke holes in the prosecution’s earlier argument that Kyle Rittenhouse could have run away instead of shooting.
He told the jury that the video they viewed during the trial of what was happening at the businesses that Rittenhouse claimed he was there to protect on Aug. 25, 2020 shows “people destroying someone else’s property.”
He continued: “Ladies and gentlemen, [assistant DA] Mr. Binger and I have gone round around round and it until the cows come home. They were rioters. They weren’t demonstrators. The demonstrators were down by the courthouse earlier in the night? Yes. There were people doing legitimate demonstration. These people were rioting.”
He said that when the first shot was fired that night, Rittenhouse “couldn’t run and continue to run from [shooting victim Joseph Rosenbaum], which he was under no legal duty to do whatsoever.”
Link Copied!
Defense attorney argues shooting victim should have "retreated"
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Kyle Rittenhouse's lead attorney Mark Richards gives his closing argument in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Monday.
(Sean Krajacic/Pool/Getty Images)
Defense attorney Mark Richards argued that Gaige Grosskreutz should have “retreated” and not confronted Kyle Rittenhouse.
Richards said that — as the jury saw on video — when Grosskreutz came in contact with Rittenhouse the defendant stated “he’s going to the police.”
“That is uncontradicted,” Richards said.
The defense attorney says that Grosskreutz should have “let him be and go give aid and comfort” to Joseph Rosenbaum, who was just shot by Rittenhouse.
“Instead, he joins the mob, chasing Kyle, arms himself, and runs in — the fifth or sixth person there to the melee,” Richards said.
Richards said that Grosskreutz was “advancing” on Rittenhouse when he shot him.
Richards’ closing argument is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Defense attorney argues there has been "a rush to judgment" in Rittenhouse case
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Defense attorney Mark Richards told the jury that after the shooting, the police placed Kyle Rittenhouse under arrest at 6 a.m. the following morning, before “all of the bullets have been picked up” off the street.
On the police and their decision to arrest Rittenhouse, Richards said, “were they under pressure? I’m sure they were.”
The defense attorney pointed out that immediately after the shooting on Aug. 25, 2020, “word got out” that Rittenhouse traveled across state lines and brought his AR-15. Unfounded rumors about Rittenhouse and White supremacist ties had also begun to circulate, he said.
Richards added that his client was charged on Aug. 27, before all the information was collected in the case.
“This has been a rush to judgment,” Richards said.
Link Copied!
Defense: Shooting victim "strikes him in the head" before Rittenhouse shot him
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Defense attorney Mark Richards said that before Rittenhouse shot Anthony Huber, the shooting victim “strikes him in the head” and is going for a “second lick” and “trying to take his head off.”
He said that Huber’s “other hand goes for the gun” in Rittenhouse’s hand. Richards noted that Gaige Grosskreutz, the only shooting victim to survive, “said he was concerned” about the “blows” against Rittenhouse.
Richards said that Grosskreutz has his hand “on the gun going for Mr. Rittenhouse” when he is shot.
Richards’s closing argument is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Defense attorney: Shooting victim was "leaping" and "lunging" at Rittenhouse when he shot him
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Defense attorney Mark Richards opened his closing argument by discussing the shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person shot by Kyle Rittenhouse on Aug. 25, 2020.
Richards said Rosenbaum was “leaping” and “lunging” at the defendant and his “hand was on the gun.”
Earlier in the day, prosecutor Thomas Binger argued that Rittenhouse provoked the violence that occurred that night when he shot Rosenbaum, nullifying the defendant’s self-defense claim.
Binger pointed out that Rosenbaum was not within “an arm’s length” of Rittenhouse when he shot him.
Richards told the jury that the “physical evidence does not lie” and asked them to “use your common sense and judgment” when considering whether Rosenbaum was a threat to Rittenhouse when he was shot.
The defense’s closing argument is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Defense accuses prosecution of "lying" that Rittenhouse provoked violence in Kenosha
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Defense attorney Mark Richards is delivering his closing argument at the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
Richards began his remarks by telling the jury that the prosecutor Thomas Binger is “lying” and “misrepresenting” the evidence when he tells them that the defendant provoked the violence on the night of August 25, 2020.
Richards said Rittenhouse “was taking off” when shooting victim Joseph Rosenbaum and others started chasing him.
The defense team will have 2.5 hours total to deliver their closing remarks.
Link Copied!
Court takes a break before defense starts closing arguments
The court is in a short break.
Prosecutor Thomas Binger finished his closing argument by telling the jury that Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty on all counts.
The defense will make their closing arguments when court is back in session.
Link Copied!
Prosecution wraps up closing argument by telling jury that Rittenhouse is "guilty of all counts"
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger gives his closing argument in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Monday.
(Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News/Pool/AP)
Prosecutor Thomas Binger finished his closing argument by telling the jury that Rittenhouse is guilty on all counts.
The assistant DA told the jury that when they deliberate, they should put themselves in the defendant’s position and ask themselves: “Would you have done the same thing?”
Binger said that a person who shoots someone “cannot hide behind self-defense, if you provoked the incident.” Earlier in his closing argument, the prosecutor argued that it was Kyle Rittenhouse the provoked the violence when, for instance, he shot Joseph Rosenbaum who he claimed was chasing him.
“If you created the danger, you forfeited the right to self-defense, by bringing that gun, aiming at people, threatening people’s lives, the defendant provoked everything. And if he does that, he has to exhaust all reasonable means to avoid a confrontation,” Binger said.
The prosecutor closed his presentation by telling the jury that “there is no doubt in this case that the defendant committed these crimes.”
After a break, the defense will begin its closing argument in the case.
Link Copied!
Prosecutor says Kyle Rittenhouse lied about being a certified EMT: "He's like a quack doctor"
From CNN's Mike Hayes
Kyle Rittenhouse listens as the attorneys and the judge talk about jury instructions in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Monday.
(Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News/Pool/AP)
Prosecutor Thomas Binger said during his closing argument that Kyle Rittenhouse was “a fraud” who lied to the press that he was a certified EMT.
“He’s been interviewed … and he said I’m a certified EMT. You’re lying. You’re absolutely lying,” Binger said.
Some more context: During their cross-examination of Rittenhouse, prosecutors played a video of an interview the defendant gave that night. In that interview, Rittenhouse said that he was a certified EMT. He acknowledged that was a lie during his testimony.
“He’s like a quack doctor. Practicing without a license,” Binger said on Monday.
Binger said that Rittenhouse showed “no remorse” for his victims that night.
Link Copied!
Prosecutor claims shooting victim did not voluntarily point his gun at Rittenhouse
From CNN's Mike Hayes
After reviewing Kyle Rittenhouse’s shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum, prosecutor Thomas Binger moved on to describe the shooting of Gaige Grosskreutz, the only shooting victim to survive.
While showing video footage of the shooting, Binger said that if at any point Grosskreutz was pointing his handgun at Rittenhouse, it happened after the defendant shot Grosskreutz in the arm, severing his bicep.
Why this matters: Earlier in the trial, Grosskreutz testified that his handgun was pointing at Rittenhouse during the shooting that night. This testimony was elicited during cross-examination by Rittenhouse’s attorney. On redirect questioning by the prosecution, Grosskreutz clarified that he never intentionally pointed his gun at Rittenhouse.
During his closing argument Monday, Binger said he wanted to “highlight the hypocrisy of the defense” regarding the threat they claim Grosskreutz was to Rittenhouse.
“Because according to the defense, if someone has a gun they’re a threat. If someone points a gun they’re a threat. There is only one exception to that. The defendant,” he said.
Binger continued: “By their logic, he gets to run around with a gun all night. But oh, we’re not supposed to take him as a threat. He gets to point the gun at everybody. But he’s not a threat. Doesn’t work that way.”
“There is no exception in the law for Kyle Rittenhouse,” the ADA said.
Link Copied!
Prosecutor: Kyle Rittenhouse lied to bystanders after shooting Joseph Rosenbaum, claiming victim "pulled a gun"
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
After the lunch break, prosecutor Thomas Binger restarted his closing argument by showing video of bystanders trying to provide medical care to Joseph Rosenbaum after Kyle Rittenhouse shot him.
“You want to talk about medics, you want to talk about people who care, you want to talk about people who were there trying to help. You just heard them and you just saw them,” Binger said, after playing the clip.
Binger pointed out that the people on the street didn’t know Joseph Rosenbaum, “they just knew somebody needed help.”
“And while that is going on, the defendant flees. Callously disregarding the body of the man that he just shot and killed,” Binger said.
The prosecutor claimed that as Rittenhouse was running away after the shooting “he’s lying to the crowd about what just happened.”
Binger then played another clip showing a bystander ask Rittenhouse why he shot Rosenbaum. In the footage, Rittenhouse appears to respond “he pulled a gun.”
He continued: “Joseph Rosenbaum didn’t have a gun. The defendant knew he didn’t have a gun. The defendant is lying to save his own skin.”
Binger said that after Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum, those around him believed they were “dealing what they perceive to be an active shooter.”
“Someone who has just shot someone who is still in possession of the gun who is fleeing the scene and how are we supposed to know where he’s going next,” Binger added.
The prosecutor said it was “entirely reasonable” for others to view Rittenhouse as a threat.
Link Copied!
Closing arguments resume
The court has reconvened and the prosecution is resuming closing arguments.
Prosecutor Thomas Binger opened his closing argument before the court went on a short break by telling the jury that he will keep his summary of the state’s case against Kyle Rittenhouse “as simple as possible.”
Binger argued that video from the night of August 25, 2020 shows Rittenhouse provoked the fatal encounter with Joseph Rosenbaum, nullifying the defendant’s self-defense claim.
Before the closing arguments, Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder spent much of the morning reading instructions to the jury, outlining some 36 pages of things they should consider when hearing closing arguments today in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse, the armed Illinois teenager who killed two people and wounded another during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last summer, is charged with five felonies.
Link Copied!
Why the idea of provocation is important in Rittenhouse trial, according to a former federal prosecutor
From CNN's Laura Coates / Written by CNN's Maureen Chowdhury
Prosecutor Thomas Binger argued that the self defense argument should not apply in Kyle Rittenhouse’s case because he provoked the situation, and this will be the key point for the jury to decide said Laura Coates, former federal prosecutor and CNN senior legal analyst.
“The idea of provocation becomes all the more important because in Wisconsin and in this trial, as been instructed, if you provoke you lose the right to claim self-defense,” Coates explained.
Some more context: Rittenhouse testified last week that he acted in self-defense when he fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum, who had thrown a plastic bag at him and chased him last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in what is likely to be the pivotal testimony of his homicide trial.
“I didn’t do anything wrong. I defended myself,” he testified.
But in cross-examination, Rittenhouse said that he knew Rosenbaum was unarmed when he ran at the teenager. Rittenhouse said he pointed his rifle at Rosenbaum in an attempt to deter him, adding that he knew pointing a rifle at someone is dangerous.
“He was chasing me, I was alone, he threatened to kill me earlier that night. I didn’t want to have to shoot him,” Rittenhouse testified. “I pointed it at him because he kept running at me and I didn’t want him to chase me.”
Link Copied!
Prosecutor argues Kyle Rittenhouse should have run away instead of shooting Joseph Rosenbaum
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News/Pool/AP)
Prosecutor Thomas Binger said during his closing argument that Kyle Rittenhouse should have continued to run away instead of shooting Joseph Rosenbaum.
Referring to video footage of the moments leading up to the shooting, that was played during Binger’s presentation, the assistant DA said Rittenhouse is “the one who chose where to run. He chose to run in between those parked cars.” Binger said that Rittenhouse then “slows down” and shoots Rosenbaum.
Binger noted that other people in the streets were running away and scattering after hearing gunshots.
The prosecutor told the jury that according to the law, Rittenhouse “has to exhaust all reasonable means of escape before killing Mr. Rosenbaum.”
The court is currently taking a break. After that, the prosecution will resume its closing arguments.
Link Copied!
Prosecution argues Rittenhouse can’t claim self-defense on "a danger you create"
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Prosector Thomas Binger is playing video footage of the shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person that Kyle Rittenhouse fatally shot on the night of August 25, 2020.
The assistant district attorney is arguing that the video shows that Kyle Rittenhouse provoked the fatal encounter with Rosenbaum, nullifying the defendant’s self-defense claim.
Binger continued: “You cannot claim self-defense against a danger you create. That’s critical right here. If you’re the one who is threatening others, you lose the right to claim self-defense.”
The prosecution is showing the shooting from multiple angles, while also pointing out that Rosenbaum was not within “an arm’s length” of Rittenhouse when he shot him.
Some more context: Rittenhouse testified last week that he acted in self-defense when he fatally shot Rosenbaum who had thrown a plastic bag at him and chased him last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in what is likely to be the pivotal testimony of his homicide trial.
“I didn’t do anything wrong. I defended myself,” he testified.
But in cross-examination, Rittenhouse said that he knew Rosenbaum was unarmed when he ran at the teenager. Rittenhouse said he pointed his rifle at Rosenbaum in an attempt to deter him, adding that he knew pointing a rifle at someone is dangerous.
“He was chasing me, I was alone, he threatened to kill me earlier that night. I didn’t want to have to shoot him,” Rittenhouse testified. “I pointed it at him because he kept running at me and I didn’t want him to chase me.”
The prosecution’s closing argument is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Prosecutor asks jury to consider Rittenhouse's motivations for being in Kenosha on night of the shootings
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Prosecutor Thomas Binger opened his closing argument by telling the jury that he will keep his summary of the state’s case against Kyle Rittenhouse “as simple as possible.”
“This is a case in which a 17-year-old teenager killed two unarmed men and severely wounded a third person with an AR-15 that did not belong to him,” he said.
Binger said that what happened on August 25, 2020, isn’t a situation where Rittenhouse was “protecting his home or his family.”
“He killed people after traveling here from Antioch, Illinois, and staying out after a citywide curfew,” Binger added.
Binger was interrupted by the defense who objected to his mention of the curfew. “There’s no curfew charge anymore,” defense attorney Mark Richards said. The judge noted that “there had been an announced curfew so I’ll leave it at that.”
Binger continued: “Although the defendant claimed to be protecting a business that he wasn’t familiar with, the actual killings, in this case, had nothing to do with that and he also spent the entire evening lying about the fact that he was an EMT.”
“None of the things that I just told you are in doubt in this case,” Binger said.
He asked the jury to consider Rittenhouse’s motivations for being in Kenosha that night.
Binger reminded the jury they all agreed to “keep an open mind” and told the attorneys that they didn’t have any “preconceived notions” about the case.
“Now you’ve heard the evidence and it’s time to search for the truth,” he said.
The prosecution’s closing argument is ongoing.
Link Copied!
Closing arguments begin in Kyle Rittenhouse trial
From CNN's Amir Vera, Carma Hassan and Brad Parks
Closing arguments are now underway in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger is delivering the state’s closing argument.
Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder has set a total time limit of two and a half hours for each side to deliver their remarks.
Schroeder explained if the prosecution is not able to establish Rittenhouse’s guilt on the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt, then the jury must acquit him.
Link Copied!
Judge and attorneys debate jury instructions for second-degree homicide
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Judge Bruce Schroeder and attorneys for both sides are currently debating the jury instructions for second-degree homicide, after sending the jury out of the room.
Schroeder had started reading the instructions to the jury before asking them to leave.
Link Copied!
Judge reads jury instructions ahead of closing arguments
From CNN's Brad Parks
(Pool)
Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder has begun reading instructions to the jury ahead of closing arguments in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.
The judge and attorneys estimated the reading of the instructions will take around 45 minutes to an hour.
Schroeder said earlier in court that there are 36 pages of jury instructions.
Moments ago, before the jury entered the room, Judge Schroeder dismissed Count 6 of the indictment against Rittenhouse – a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
The charge was punishable by up to nine months in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Rittenhouse now faces five charges.
Link Copied!
Judge dismisses gun charge against Kyle Rittenhouse
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Judge Bruce Schroeder just dismissed Count 6 of the indictment against Kyle Rittenhouse, a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
The charge was punishable by up to nine months in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Rittenhouse now faces five charges.
Some more context: The count that the judge just dismissed, which was listed as Count 6 in the indictment, was a misdemeanor stating that Rittenhouse was under 18 years old with a dangerous weapon.
Rittenhouse, now 18 years old, still faces five felony charges from the events of Aug. 25, 2020. If he is convicted of the most serious charge against him, he faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison. Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Link Copied!
Judge and attorneys are discussing jury instructions before closing arguments begin
From CNN's Mike Hayes
(Pool)
Before the court brings in the jury, Judge Bruce Schroeder and both sides are discussing jury instructions this morning inside the Kenosha, Wisconsin courtroom.
Schroeder indicated that the document he’ll be reading to instruct the jury on their deliberations will be 36-pages long.
We’re expecting closing arguments to follow.
Link Copied!
Here are the counts the jury will weigh in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial
The panel will consider five felony counts and a misdemeanor weapons charge against Rittenhouse. Using an AR-15-type rifle, he killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, during street demonstrations over the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
First-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon: Count 1 states that Rittenhouse recklessly caused the death of Rosenbaum under circumstances that showed utter disregard for human life.
First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon: Count 2 states that Kyle Rittenhouse recklessly endangered the safety of Richard McGinniss — a journalist with the conservative Daily Caller — under circumstances that show utter disregard for human life.
First-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon: Count 3 states that Rittenhouse did cause the death of Huber, with intent to kill him. It’s the most serious charge he faces, with a mandatory life sentence. Huber swung his skateboard at Rittenhouse after Rosenbaum was fatally shot.
First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon: Count 4 states that Rittenhouse did recklessly endanger the safety of an unknown male, referred to as “jump kick man” in court, under circumstances that show utter disregard for human life.
Attempted first-degree intentional homicide, use of a weapon: Count 5 states that Rittenhouse attempted to cause the death of Grosskreutz, with intent to kill him.
Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18: Count 6, a misdemeanor, states that Rittenhouse was under 18 years old with a dangerous weapon. Aside from the evidence presented at trial and the instructions on the law, the personal views of jurors and the polarizing nature of the case could also come into play.
Closing arguments will be given for up to five hours Monday and the jury of eight men and 10 women will be narrowed to 12 by a drawing of names, according to the judge.
A verdict is possible this week in a case already drawing the attention of a divided nation.
Closing arguments are expected today. Here's what happened last week in the Rittenhouse trial.
From CNN's Ray Sanchez, Eric Levenson, Brad Parks and Carma Hassan
Judge Bruce Schroeder speaks during the trial on November 12.
(Sean Krajacic/Pool/Getty Images)
Testimony in the Kyle Rittenhouse homicide trial in Wisconsin concluded Thursday, with closing arguments expected Monday in a high-profile case that has polarized the nation.
Jurors heard from more than 30 witnesses over eight days. The highlight came Wednesday when the 18-year-old defendant took the stand and offered dramatic testimony interrupted by tears and several heated exchanges between the judge and prosecutor.
Judge Bruce Schroeder told jurors that each side will have two and half hours for closings Monday before he instructs the panel on the law.
The jury of eight men and 10 women will be narrowed to 12 by a drawing of names, according to the judge.
The closely watched case has divided observers who consider the young man a do-gooder out protecting businesses from protesters against police brutality and others who saw an armed vigilante looking for trouble.
Rittenhouse’s testimony was crucial to both prosecution and defense arguments about his actions on the night of Aug. 25, 2020. He shot at four people, killing two of them and wounding one. The prosecution sought to show that Rittenhouse’s actions were reckless and criminal, while the defense said he acted in self-defense.
Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to six charges, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and first-degree attempted intentional homicide. Schroeder dismissed a curfew violation charge Tuesday, saying prosecutors had failed to present evidence to support it.
Prosecutors told the court Thursday they intend ask that jurors be allowed to consider lesser charges on some counts.
If convicted of the most serious charge against him, Rittenhouse faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison.