April 7, 2023 - Texas judge suspends approval of medication abortion pill | CNN Politics

April 7, 2023 - Texas judge suspends approval of medication abortion pill

TX abortion pills 8
At 7 weeks pregnant she wanted an abortion. Here's why she turned to a doctor in Austria
03:58 - Source: CNN

What we covered here

Our live coverage has ended. Follow the latest news here or read through the updates below. 

28 Posts

Mifepristone ruling is "grievous legal overstep," OB/GYN group says

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a statement late Friday that a federal judge’s ruling in Texas over mifepristone is “inflammatory” and a “grievous legal overstep.”

FDA says it has appealed judge's ruling in Texas and stands by mifepristone approval

The US Food and Drug Administration issued the following statement Friday night in response to the ruling of a federal judge in Texas about its approval of mifepristone:

Biden promises his administration will fight Texas ruling on abortion pill

President Joe Biden promised late Friday night that his administration will fight against a Texas judge’s ruling that seeks to halt the FDA’s approval of a medication abortion pill.

The Justice Department filed a notice of appeal Friday night.

DOJ, drug manufacturer appeal Texas medication abortion ruling to federal appeals court

A judge’s order that seeks to halt the FDA’s approval of a medication abortion drug has been appealed to a federal appeals court.

Both the Justice Department and Danco, a manufacturer of the drug that intervened in the case, filed notices of appeal to the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The order halting the approval had already been put on pause for seven days by the judge who handed it down, in order to give the DOJ time to appeal.

Mifepristone manufacturer releases statement in response to Texas ruling

Danco Laboratories, the pharmaceutical company that manufactures the abortion pill Mifepristone, released a statement Friday in response to a Texas federal judge issuing a ruling that will suspend the FDA’s two-decade-old approval of the pill.

Long added that the order “fails to account for the meticulous, well-documented FDA decision-making process that led to the initial 2000 approval and the subsequent approvals setting the conditions under which Mifeprex has been distributed for 23 years.”

Jessica Ellsworth, lead counsel for Danco, said in the statement that Danco plans to appeal the ruling and “feels strongly that the rule of law should prevail in this case, which would result in a reversal of this ruling.”

Read the medication abortion drug ruling out of Washington state

A federal judge in Washington state ruled the FDA must keep medication abortion drugs available in more than a dozen Democratic-led states. 

Read the decision here:

Ocasio-Cortez says Biden administration should ignore Texas judge's ruling

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaks with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Friday, April 7, 2023.

New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called on President Joe Biden to ignore a Texas judge’s ruling halting the approval of a medication abortion pill during an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper Friday.

The congresswoman said conservative jurists have undermined their legitimacy through the “deeply partisan and unfounded nature” of these rulings.

Pushed by Cooper on whether the lawmaker wanted a system where the federal government ignores the judiciary, Ocasio-Cortez said the FDA and the Biden administration will consider the merits of several legal challenges and decide “how exactly we mapped this out.”

But the congresswoman said a Republican “power grab” in the judiciary has created a situation in which the legitimacy of their rulings is in doubt.

Asked again if she thinks the Biden administration should flatly ignore the ruling, Ocasio-Cortez said the presidency and Congress can and should act as a check on the judiciary, but she did not outline a specific course of action as it pertains to the Biden administration’s tack on the abortion ruling.

Some key context: US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, who made the ruling halting the abortion pill’s FDA approval, is an appointee of former President Donald Trump and known as a deeply conservative jurist.

During his presidency, Trump and then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell placed a heavy focus on confirming more than 200 judicial nominees, leaving a significant imprint on the judiciary that could last for decades.

Ocasio-Cortez said Democrats have been “preparing and anticipating for there being these egregious overreaches by members of the judiciary,” saying its a natural progression from Republican efforts to “pack these courts with partisan judges.”

Remember: The Texas ruling is on hold for seven days so the federal government can appeal. The decision is complicated further by the ruling of a second federal judge in Washington state, who said the drug must remain on the market in more than a dozen Democratic-led states.

CNN’s Ted Barrett contributed to this report.

Organizations and officials react to Texas judge's ruling

Organizations and officials are reacting to US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s decision Friday to halt the FDA’s approval of the medication abortion pill, mifepristone.

The American Medical Association blasted Kacsmaryk’s decision, saying it “flies in the face of science and evidence.” 

The Alliance Defending Freedom called Friday’s ruling in the case “a significant victory.” But Erik Baptist, an attorney with the group, said he is not yet sure how a separate ruling in a case in Washington could conflict with the ruling.

He told reporters he has not yet taken a look at the ruling out of Washington that directly conflicts with the ruling out of Texas. 

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel expressed her disappointment in the ruling Friday.

The Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America nonprofit called the decision “a win for the health and safety of women and girls.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the ruling “ignores facts, science, and the law” and puts “the health of millions of women and girls at risk.”

Sen. Amy Klobuchar spoke to CNN’s Anderson Cooper about the ruling Friday.

Planned Parenthood called Kacsmaryk’s decision a “deeply harmful move.”

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she is “horrified” by the Texas ruling.

Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont called the ruling “another devastating attack on “reproductive rights” and said that it “is about controlling medical decisions that should be between patients and their doctors.”

Maine Gov. Janet T. Mills called the decision “reckless” and said it “ignores basic science and facts.”

Justice Department to appeal decision by Texas judge suspending FDA approval of medication abortion pill

The US Justice Department will appeal the decision by the Texas judge who said he will suspend the FDA’s two-decade-old approval of a medication abortion pill, Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement Friday.

US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk said he was pausing his ruling for seven days so the federal government could appeal. 

Garland said the department will also review the decision by the judge in Washington state who said in a new ruling that the FDA must keep medication abortion drugs available in more than a dozen states that sued the FDA to make the abortion pills.

Federal judge in Washington state case had previously ruled in favor of reproductive rights advocates

The federal judge in Washington state who issued a ruling Friday in a key abortion lawsuit has previously ruled in favor of reproductive rights advocates in a Trump-era dispute.  

US District Judge Thomas Owen Rice was appointed to the Eastern District of Washington in 2011 by President Barack Obama. The Senate confirmed Rice for the post in 2012 by a vote of 93-4.  

In his ruling, Rice said the FDA must keep medication abortion drugs available in more than a dozen liberal states that sued the FDA to make the abortion pills more accessible.  

The judge previously sided with an abortion rights group when he issued a permanent injunction in 2018 that blocked the Trump administration from slashing grants to a Planned Parenthood program that funds teen pregnancy prevention programs across the country. 

Planned Parenthood brought the case against the Trump administration after the government ended Teen Pregnancy Prevention grants for 81 organizations across the nation. The grants to fund the program were supposed to run through 2020, but the Department of Health and Human Services said the grants would end in 2018 instead, arguing that the program was unsuccessful. 

Rice served as chief judge of the Eastern District of Washington from 2016 to 2020. Prior to his appointment, Rice had served since 1987 as an assistant US Attorney in Washington.  

"This is a significant victory." Lawyer in Texas medication abortion lawsuit hails Friday’s ruling

A lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the medication abortion lawsuit in Texas called Friday’s ruling “a significant victory,” but said that he is not yet sure how a separate ruling in a Washington state case could conflict with it. 

Baptist said he has not yet looked at the ruling out of Washington that directly conflicts with the Texas ruling.

“I’m still digesting the court’s decision from the Northern District of Texas. I have not had an opportunity to review the Washington state decision to see how it may or may not impact the court’s decision in our litigation in Texas,” he said. 

“I’m not sure whether there’s a direct conflict yet and with the Washington state decision just because I haven’t read it yet, but there may not be a direct conflict,” he added later. “But if there is a direct conflict then there may be – it may be inevitably going to Supreme Court, but I’m not convinced that it’s necessary at this point to make that conclusion.” 

Asked about the seven-day stay issued by Kacsmaryk in the case, Baptist said: “The court was recognizing and acknowledging that the government had already asked that and proceeded to give it. So it’s a reasonable relief that the court gave to the government to seek that appeal in the interim.” 

White House lawyers are reviewing dueling rulings

White House lawyers are currently reviewing the opposing decisions from judges in Washington and Texas on the FDA’s approval of a medication abortion pill, according to an official. 

Vice President Harris calls Texas ruling a "dangerous precedent"

Harris speaks with reporters at an airfield in Nashville on Friday, April 7.

Making her first remarks on a Texas judge’s decision to halt the approval of a medication abortion pill, Vice President Kamala Harris said the decision set “a dangerous precedent.”

Harris spoke to reporters at an airfield in Nashville on Friday after meeting with Democratic lawmakers in Tennessee.

The vice president noted the FDA approved the drug, mifepristone, 20 years ago, and said it has been “proven to be safe” in the two decades since.

Harris said she would have more remarks after reviewing the judge’s ruling. President Joe Biden has yet to publicly weigh in on the case.

“As a general matter, I’ll say that there is no question that the president and I are going to stand with the women of America and do everything we can to ensure that women have the ability to make decisions about their health care, their reproductive health care,” Harris said.

Remember: There are two major decisions on medication abortion that came down in short succession this evening. After the Texas judge’s ruling on mifepristone, a second federal judge ruled the drug must remain on the market in more than a dozen Democratic-led states.

The two decisions mark the most significant abortion-related rulings since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.

CNN’s Sam Fossum contributed to this report.

What the federal judge in Washington state said

In a striking split screen to the ruling out of Texas, where US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas tore apart the process the FDA used to approve the drug, mifepristone, which is the first drug used in a two-drug regime to terminate a pregnancy, Judge Thomas Owen Rice in Washington state took a more deferential tone toward to the FDA, ordering that the status quo be maintained by keeping the drug on the marker.

Here are the states where medication abortion approval isn’t immediately affected

The states where the approval of mifepristone is not affected, thanks to the ruling from a federal judge Friday in Washington state:

Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC.

Dramatic turn of events: Federal judge in Washington state says FDA cannot withdraw mifepristone

In a dramatic turn of events, a federal judge in Washington state said Friday night in a new ruling that the FDA must keep medication abortion drugs available in 17 liberal states and Washington, DC, that sued the FDA to make the abortion pills.

This lawsuit is separate from the ruling that came down in Texas minutes earlier that will halt the approval of the drug. That ruling was paused for seven days, giving the Justice Department time to appeal.

Medical abortion ruling could have long-term impacts on FDA approval and drug manufacturers

A federal judge’s decision could have long-term impacts on the trust in the FDA’s approval process and chill pharmaceutical companies from developing new drugs, according to Elizabeth Cohen, CNN senior medical correspondent.

Mifepristone has about 5 deaths per million users, while other commonly used drugs like Penicillin have about 20 deaths per million users, she said.

“So if this judge is so concerned about side effects, why isn’t he saying let’s take penicillin off the market?” Cohen said.

Further, Cohen said a ruling that allows a judge to take a drug off the market could make pharmaceutical companies nervous. She said confidence in scientists at the FDA is critical for the development and creation of new drugs people need.

“If they think that just one judge can take that drug off the market, they may not be willing to invest that kind of money,” Cohen said.

Judge's ruling is "quite stunning," CNN medical correspondent says

The move to suspend the FDA’s two-decade-old approval of mifepristone was a stunning move, CNN’s senior medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen said Friday.

She said it will “be a real problem for reproductive healthcare” if women aren’t allowed to take mifepristone.

She added that FDA scientists are “the ones who look through all the data.”

Suspending mifepristone is "quite scary" for women, CNN medical correspondent says

More than half of abortions in the United States are medication abortions, said Elizabeth Cohen, CNN senior medical correspondent, which means a new ruling from a federal judge in Texas to suspend FDA approval of one of the medical abortion drugs is going to impact people across the country.

He is pausing his ruling for seven days so the federal government can appeal, but if at any point that suspension goes into effect, it will take away the option of medical abortion.

The drug, mifepristone, is the first drug in the medication abortion process.

Cohen said women rely on mifepristone and medical abortions for other circumstances as well, including when they have miscarriages or need to have an abortion because the fetus is non-viable.

“They rely on this for all sorts of reasons, and they wouldn’t be able to do that,” Cohen said.

CNN legal analyst: "This isn't going to be the last word."

CNN Supreme Court analyst Steve Vladeck said Judge Kacsmaryk’s ruling “may never go into effect,” but that the administration will now have to appeal it to higher courts that are stacked with conservative jurists. 

“This isn’t going to be the last word. Even Judge Kascmaryk recognizes that he can’t let this ruling go into immediate effect. And it may never go into effect,” said Vladeck, who is a professor at the University of Texas School of Law.  

“But this puts the onus on the Biden administration to get either the most conservative appeals court in the country, or the most conservative Supreme Court in our lifetime, to freeze this ruling before it can go into effect,” Vladeck added. 

Read more

What to know about the lawsuit aiming to ban medication abortion drug mifepristone
Takeaways from the Texas hearing on medication abortion drugs
Matthew Kacsmaryk: The Trump-appointed judge overseeing the blockbuster medication abortion lawsuit
What is mifepristone, the drug at the heart of the Texas medication abortion lawsuit?
How safe is the abortion pill compared with other common drugs
Judge appears open to blocking medication abortion drug after hearing in Texas
Survey finds widespread confusion around medication abortion in post-Roe US

Read more

What to know about the lawsuit aiming to ban medication abortion drug mifepristone
Takeaways from the Texas hearing on medication abortion drugs
Matthew Kacsmaryk: The Trump-appointed judge overseeing the blockbuster medication abortion lawsuit
What is mifepristone, the drug at the heart of the Texas medication abortion lawsuit?
How safe is the abortion pill compared with other common drugs
Judge appears open to blocking medication abortion drug after hearing in Texas
Survey finds widespread confusion around medication abortion in post-Roe US