Former Rep. Matt Gaetz filed a lawsuit Monday asking a federal judge to block the official release of a long-awaited House Ethics Committee report about his potential misconduct while in office.
Gaetz filed the lawsuit around the same time that CNN and other outlets reported on a draft of the report’s findings about his alleged sexual misconduct and drug use — so the practical impact of his lawsuit is unclear. Further, within hours of the lawsuit being filed, the committee officially released the report on its website, making his lawsuit essentially moot.
In the lawsuit, which was filed in Washington, DC, against the committee and its chair, Gaetz claimed releasing the report would cause “immediate, severe and irreversible” damage to his reputation, in part because “media coverage would be immediate and widespread.” He also claimed he wasn’t notified of the panel’s plans to release the report, nor was he provided copies of the materials.
“As such, Plaintiff has been afforded no opportunity to respond to any report or investigative conclusions,” the lawsuit says.
Gaetz lawyers said he has “frequently and vehemently declared his innocence regarding the alleged misconduct” and had asked the committee to “cease their investigation and provide him appropriate due process rights.” He said the Republican-run panel has been “unresponsive” to those demands.
CNN has reached out to Gaetz’s attorneys about the report. The House Ethics Committee declined to comment on the lawsuit.
In a post on X after filing the lawsuit, Gaetz said, “they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses.” He further said “giving funds to someone you are dating” is not prostitution, citing testimony from a woman who said she didn’t charge him for sex.
“The Committee’s apparent intention to release its report after explicitly acknowledging it lacks jurisdiction over former members, its failure to follow constitutional notions of due process, and failure to adhere to its own procedural rules and precedent represents an unprecedented overreach that threatens fundamental constitutional rights and established procedural protections,” the lawsuit states.