Congressional hearings aren’t exactly known for fact-finding and informed inquiry, but we just got a bunch of really good questions directed at Robinhood executives.
    
    
            From Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez:
    
    
            – “Robinhood seems to have perfected the gamification of trading providing the user with the perception that investing through the Robinhood app offers recreational gain … with no downside risk. … How does Robinhood balance disclosures about the potential downside risk of investing, including substantial downside loss?”
    
    
            Vlad Tenev’s response: “We know that investing is serious and we’re investing in all the educational tools and support to help people on their investing journey.”
    
    
            From Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer:
    
    
            – “Do you think we need more legislation or did the system actually work? Was it self-correcting? The fact that someone like yourself was able to take advantage of shorting? Maybe there was over-aggressive investing that was taking place … they didn’t work because you outsmarted the system?”
    
    
            Keith Gill’s response: “Increased transparency could help so someone like me could have a better understanding of how those things work could be quite beneficial to retail investors.”
    
    
            – “You mentioned settling trades in real time … What are the unintended consequences if you did something like that?”
    
    
            Tenev’s response: “Certain market participants rely on next-day settlement to be able to take advantage of intraday netting and run up larger one-sided positions in certain stock with the knowledge they can close those positions by the time settlements happen, and I understand that could be a limitation to some of these institutions. … I don’t think these are insurmountable challenges.”